Jason Murray Kubler vs Hyeon Chung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W L L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Kubler 1 - 0 Chung
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kubler winning 2 and Chung winning 0. The last match between Kubler and Chung was at the Busan Challenger, 18-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jason Murray Kubler | 1 |
| Hyeon Chung | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Busan Challenger(18-04-2025)
Jason Murray Kubler
Hyeon Chung
6
2
6
4
| Kubler | Stats | Chung |
|---|---|---|
| 80% (32-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (26-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 203 | Ranking | 377 |
| 63 | Highest Rank | 19 |
| 32 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 25 | Titles | 17 |
| 68% (446-214) | Career Total W/L | 65% (282-149) |
| $1,243,795 | Career Prize Money | $2,529,406 |
| 4 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
McCabe VS Burruchaga PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zeppieri VS Jubb PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hyeon Chung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:38:1 | Average Match Time | 1:38:1 |
| 51% (26/51) | 1st Serve % | 56% (38/68) |
| 85% (22/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (24/38) |
| 60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 49% (33/68) | Return Points Win % | 27% (14/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kubler vs Chung Match Preview :
When diving into the intricacies of second serve performance over the past six months, the numbers tell an enlightening story. Could it be that the percentage of points won on second serves holds the key to predicting match outcomes? Take Chung and Kubler, for instance. Chung has clinched 39.92% of points on their second serve, while Kubler edges ahead with 46.24%. The significance of these figures is high, as they have been known to closely forecast match results.
Switching gears to return game statistics, we delve into who might have the upper hand in breaking their opponent's serve. Here, Chung has secured 45.15% of their competitor's second serve points recently, with Kubler again narrowly surpassing at 45.37%. However, the first serve return statistics add an interesting twist. Chung thrives by winning 30.17% of their opponent's first serve points, while Kubler lags with 21.38%. This disparity might just tilt the balance of this head-to-head encounter.
How does facing pressure impact these players? Chung has managed to save 45.45% of breakpoints, yet Kubler proves more resilient, saving 56.3%. These statistics could be incredibly useful for in-game betting strategies. Both players have impressive match records over the past year; Chung has triumphed in 75% of their matches, whereas Kubler edges out with a 77.14% success rate. Predicting outcomes often revolves around these holistic views of player performance.
Surface preferences further reveal interesting dimensions. Chung excels on Hard courts, boasting a 70% win rate, but struggles on Grass. Meanwhile, Kubler demonstrates prowess on Clay with a 70% success rate and finds Indoor Hard courts less favorable. Surface compatibility often influences match predictions, potentially affecting player confidence and game strategy.
Evaluating player level illuminates where each player stands in the competitive hierarchy. Over the past year, Chung has showcased their skills predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, achieving a 77.42% win rate. Kubler, competing mainly at the same level, leads with an 83.33% win rate. Comparing their standings against opponent quality reveals Chung facing competitors with an average rank of 259.14, while Kubler's adversaries rank at 227.83 on average. Such insights are crucial to estimate who might be the titular favorite.
In scenarios extending to deciding sets, prediction enthusiasts might be swayed by recent stats. Chung has clinched 44% of these intense final sets, narrowly besting Kubler, who has a 43% success rate in similar situations. Moreover, past performances in current events should never be overlooked, as they often reveal players' momentum and adaptability. Finally, analyzing break point conversion, Chung presents a strength by converting 33.12% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Kubler's 29.31% efficiency.
In light of these in-depth comparisons and critical statistics, Kubler emerges as the potential victor in this matchup. Their marginally stronger second serve performance, ability to save breakpoints, and slightly higher overall match-winning percentage provide a compelling prediction in favor of their triumph.
Kubler vs Chung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yan Bai
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
80%
(
61 of
76)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Chase Ferguson
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Xirui Han
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
111)
6
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
37 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Bjorn Swenson
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Pranav Kumar
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Hyeon Chung
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kenta Miyoshi
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (446/214) | Win/Loss | 65% (282/149) |
| 64% (989/549) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (645/391) |
| 55% (8004/6453) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5200/4258) |
| 66% (158/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (228/104) |
| 70% (249/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (30/21) |
| 38% (6/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 65% (33/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2155 | Aces Total | 1208 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1831 | Total Double Faults | 1075 |
| 1:9:42 | Average Match Time | 1:24:40 |
| 505.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 523.25 |
| 61% (19198/31240) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15422/24736) |
| 72% (13733/19198) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10847/15422) |
| 51% (6098/12041) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4710/9314) |
| 44% (1424/3230) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1251/2805) |
| 40% (12677/31524) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10713/25805) |
| 51% (25/24) | Slam W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 36% (4/7) | Masters W/L | 52% (17/16) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 83% (10/2) |
| 47% (24/27) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (59/47) |
| 67% (166/81) | Challenger W/L | 68% (100/46) |
| 75% (226/74) | Futures W/L | 77% (74/22) |
| 69% (427/619) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (251/385) |
| 48% (15/31) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 55% (112/203) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (67/128) |
| 58% (107/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (69/119) |
| 90% (425/384) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/243) |
| 9% (425/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (280/37) |
| 26% (235/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (151/39) |
Kubler vs. Chung Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
