Jason Murray Kubler vs Christian Langmo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W W L W W W L W W LHead-to-head: Kubler 3 - 0 Langmo
They have played 6 sets in total, with Kubler winning 6 and Langmo winning 0. The last match between Kubler and Langmo was at the M25 Launceston, 01-03-2025, Semifinals, Hard with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 7-6(10) 7-5.
M25 Launceston(01-03-2025)
7
6
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Birrell VS Sasnovich PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Chirico VS Bonaventure PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(10) 7-5 |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats
3
H2H Matches
0
6
Sets Won
0
38
Games Won
24
18
Aces (Total)
27
8
Total Double Faults
7
1:38:18
Average Match Time
1:38:18
65% (118/182)
1st Serve %
70% (150/213)
79% (93/118)
1st Serve Win %
68% (102/150)
63% (40/64)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (30/63)
42% (8/19)
Break Points Won % (Total)
13% (1/8)
38% (81/213)
Return Points Win %
27% (49/182)
100% (3/3)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/3)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (3/3)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (3/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (3/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jason Murray Kubler vs Christian Langmo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jason Murray Kubler 3 - 0 Christian Langmo
Hold onto your tennis rackets, folks, because we've got a hilarious showdown between Kubler and Langmo lined up, and the statistics are indeed the ball boys of this match! Kubler’s second serve has been clocking in at 46.27% over the last six months, just narrowly hitting below Langmo’s 46.82%. They’re practically neck and neck and if these numbers are any indication, they couldn't be more synchronized if they tried.
In the art of returning serves, Kubler seems to be the Picasso of second serve returns with a winning percentage of 46.1%, leaving Langmo trailing slightly at 44.11%. Yet when it comes to the first serve returns, Langmo steals the spotlight with 21.8% while Kubler pings in at 21.65%, indicating that Kubler’s favorite sport might just be squash! When the pressure turns up, Langmo shows nerves of steel, saving a whopping 63.47% of breakpoints, compared to Kubler's effort at 54.46%. It seems Langmo should moonlight as a bomb disposal expert or a high-wire trapeze artist.
Speaking of performances, over the past year, Kubler is writing a gripping tennis saga, winning 76.92% of his matches (W/L 20/6), whereas Langmo is delivering a strong thesis statement with a 62.82% win rate (W/L 49/29). Although Kubler loves to get his hands dirty on clay, boasting an impressive 70% career win rate, Langmo prefers the commendable hardness of hard courts, with a 60% win rate. However, throw them both onto an indoor hard court and suddenly, they’re like cats in a rainstorm!
Both players seem to frequent different tennis clubs; Kubler shines in lower-tier tournaments ($10K), where he has won 88.24% of his matches, while Langmo enjoys the challenge of higher-stakes circuits, claiming victory in 54.17% of his matches. But wait, there's more! While Kubler might adroitly dance through deciding sets against all players at a 50% success rate, Langmo tangoes ahead with a stylish 69% winning stride.
And now for the pièce de résistance – their head-to-head performances. Having met only twice before, Kubler has been the conquering hero both times, clinching all four sets and leaving Langmo in zero-gravity frustration. Their last rendezvous at the Brisbane 2 Challenger on a hard court led to yet another triumph for Kubler at 6-4, 6-4. It seems Langmo might want to consider a rain dance before the match, given Kubler’s penchant for pouring victories.
In essence, while Langmo may shine in pockets of play, the daunting precedent set by Kubler gives our prediction game a certain swag. With the serve and return stats paired with the head-to-head history, Kubler seems primed to dominate yet another encounter. Unless the tennis gods decide to change the script last minute, Kubler’s racket might need an Oscar after this match.
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Cruz Hewitt
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Joshua Sheehy
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Shintaro Imai
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Joshua Charlton
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Omar Jasika
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Dane Sweeny
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Christian Langmo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Seongbin Sim
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
67% (429/211)
Win/Loss
58% (244/176)
64% (952/540)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (546/422)
55% (7738/6280)
Games Win/Loss
52% (4891/4539)
66% (150/79)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (199/132)
70% (243/105)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (41/39)
38% (6/10)
Indoor Hard W/L
33% (2/4)
64% (30/17)
Grass Win/Loss
67% (2/1)
0.29
Aces Per Game
0.58
2016
Aces Total
2664
0.26
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
1760
Total Double Faults
1148
1:8:28
Average Match Time
1:32:3
497.18
Average Opponent Rank
459.2
62% (18381/29885)
1st Serve %
63% (15747/25131)
71% (13095/18381)
1st Serve Win %
74% (11621/15747)
51% (5819/11503)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4697/9384)
44% (1350/3070)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (844/2210)
40% (12069/30106)
Return Points Win %
37% (9395/25608)
51% (24/23)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
36% (4/7)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (1/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
47% (24/27)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
66% (158/80)
Challenger W/L
49% (64/66)
75% (218/73)
Futures W/L
62% (180/110)
68% (410/599)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (241/412)
48% (15/31)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
55% (108/196)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (79/141)
58% (104/180)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (74/133)
90% (408/367)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (232/199)
9% (408/38)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (232/33)
26% (232/61)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (187/45)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
