Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jason Jung vs Daniel Evans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jung vs Evans analysis and find out who is favored!
Jason Jung vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jung has won 53.91% of points on his second serve, while Evans has won 51.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jung, in recent form, has won 55.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Evans has won 48.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.04% and 24.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jung has saved 62.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evans has saved 60.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jung has won 65.38% of matches played (W/L 34/ 18), with Evans winning 32.43% (W/L 12/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 307/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26). Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 45/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.71% of matches (W/L 23/ 12), where as Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 29.41% of matches (W/L 5/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jung winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jung winning 0 and Evans winning 4. The last match between Jung and Evans was at the BB&T Atlanta Open - Atlanta, 23-07-2019, First, Hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jung and Evans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jung winning 0 times and Evans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jung winning 0, and Evans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.79 while Evans has played against players with an average rank of 134.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jung has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evans has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jung has converted 43.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evans has converted 29.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jung 0 - 2 Evans
269
Rank
114
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
69
Rank
21
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
56% (412-327)
Career Total W/L
60% (550-370)
67% (4-2)
YTD W/L
23% (3-10)
$350,585
Career Prize Money
$4,736,130
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jason Jung | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 10 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (75/119) | 60% (53/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (43/75) | 75% (40/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (13/44) | 63% (22/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 59% (10/17) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (26/88) | 53% (63/119) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Jason Jung
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jason Jung
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jason Jung | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (4/2) | 23% (3/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 33% (11/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (64/52) | 45% (145/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:41 | 2:9:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 330.67 | 162.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (233/358) | 57% (579/1015) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (168/233) | 71% (409/579) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (69/125) | 52% (225/436) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (15/40) | 30% (22/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (148/383) | 34% (352/1039) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 25% (3/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Jason Jung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Maximus Jones
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jason Jung
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Yunseong Chung
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Daniel Evans
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
12
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Daniel Evans
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Roman Safiullin
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jung Vs Evans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
