Jaroslav Pospisil vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pospisil vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaroslav Pospisil vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pospisil has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Carabelli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pospisil, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pospisil has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pospisil has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Carabelli winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pospisil has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 111/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 33/ 46). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Pospisil has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pospisil has played against opponents with an average rank of 586 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pospisil has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pospisil has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pospisil 0 - 0 Carabelli
24
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jaroslav Pospisil | Camilo UGO Carabelli |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Jaroslav Pospisil Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Noah Rubin
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
10
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Borna Gojo
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
17
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luis Britto
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more