Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jarkko Nieminen vs Thomaz Bellucci Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nieminen vs Bellucci analysis and find out who is favored!
Jarkko Nieminen vs Thomaz Bellucci Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nieminen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bellucci has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nieminen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bellucci has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nieminen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bellucci has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nieminen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bellucci winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nieminen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 202/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 27/ 32). Bellucci has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 344/ 239), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 6/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Nieminen winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Nieminen winning 4 and Bellucci winning 4. The last match between Nieminen and Bellucci was at the Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel, 01-11-2011, First, I.hard with Jarkko Nieminen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:42:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nieminen and Bellucci have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nieminen winning 2 times and Bellucci 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nieminen winning 0, and Bellucci 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nieminen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bellucci has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nieminen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bellucci has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nieminen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bellucci has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nieminen 2 - 1 Bellucci
Ret.
Rank
13
High
42
Age
L
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
21
High
36
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
58% (574-409)
Career Total W/L
54% (481-414)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,231,200
Career Prize Money
$2,594,025
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | Thomaz Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 45 | 41 |
| Aces (Total) | 21 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:42:10 | 0:42:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (191/283) | 57% (155/271) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (128/191) | 69% (107/155) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (52/92) | 50% (58/116) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (10/23) | 30% (7/23) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (106/271) | 36% (103/283) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
62%
(
75 of
121)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
105)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
43 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
118
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | Thomaz Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomaz Bellucci Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Jurgen Briand
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Luke Johnson
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
53%
(
68 of
129)
1st Serve %
67%
(
86 of
128)
10
Aces
14
9
Double Faults
6
84%
(
57 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
66 of
86)
57%
(
35 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
37 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
39 of
128)
131
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(8) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Thomaz Bellucci
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomaz Bellucci
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
58 of
70)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Nieminen Vs Bellucci Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
