Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jarkko Nieminen vs Martin Klizan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nieminen vs Klizan analysis and find out who is favored!
Jarkko Nieminen vs Martin Klizan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nieminen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Klizan has won 52.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nieminen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Klizan has won 53.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nieminen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Klizan has saved 57.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nieminen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Klizan winning 84% (W/L 21/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nieminen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 202/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 27/ 32). Klizan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 296/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 4/ 15).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nieminen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nieminen winning 2 and Klizan winning 0. The last match between Nieminen and Klizan was at the Sony Open Tennis - Miami, 23-03-2013, Second, Hard with Jarkko Nieminen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nieminen and Klizan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nieminen winning 0 times and Klizan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nieminen winning 0, and Klizan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nieminen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Klizan has played against players with an average rank of 201.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nieminen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Klizan has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nieminen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Klizan has converted 54.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nieminen 1 - 0 Klizan
Ret.
Rank
13
High
42
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
839
Rank
24
High
34
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
58% (574-409)
Career Total W/L
58% (483-350)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
86% (18-3)
$3,231,200
Career Prize Money
$2,947,100
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | Martin Klizan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:12 | 1:16:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (33/63) | 44% (22/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (23/33) | 55% (12/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 32% (9/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (29/50) | 37% (23/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Martin Klizan
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | Martin Klizan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (18/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 76% (34/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (238/155) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 85% (11/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:21:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 240 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (582/1041) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (406/582) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (239/459) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 52% (59/113) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (457/1015) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 89% (16/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 84% (16/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/3) |
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Klizan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Diego Fernandez Flores
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Iliyan Radulov
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Sander Jong
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Ivan Perez Martin
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Martin Klizan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Michael Agwi
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
2
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Edas Butvilas
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nieminen Vs Klizan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Martin Klizan
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
