Jarkko Nieminen vs David Nalbandian Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
5 - 8
58% (574-409)
Career Total W/L
67% (460-223)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$3,231,200
Career Prize Money
$4,611,715
0
YTD Titles
0
Nieminen VS Nalbandian H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
David Nalbandian
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
84)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 6-4 4-2 ret. |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
56
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(9) 6-2 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
61 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
David Nalbandian
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
42%
(
31 of
73)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
65%
(
88 of
136)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
50 of
86)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
39%
(
53 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
141
Total Points Won
121
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
| 6-2 2-6 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| 5-7 6-3 6-1 4-6 7-6(3) |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
49%
(
74 of
150)
1st Serve %
48%
(
81 of
168)
5
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
59 of
81)
58%
(
44 of
76)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
49 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
66 of
168)
167
Total Points Won
151
|
||||
view more
Nieminen VS Nalbandian H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | David Nalbandian |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 5 | 8 |
| Sets Won | 14 | 21 |
| Games Won | 153 | 180 |
| Aces (Total) | 23 | 32 |
| Total Double Faults | 19 | 22 |
| Average Match Time | 0:13:34 | 0:13:34 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (421/696) | 54% (349/648) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 61% (255/421) | 69% (242/349) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (129/275) | 53% (157/299) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (23/63) | 46% (36/79) |
| Return Points Win % | 38% (249/648) | 45% (312/696) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) | 55% (6/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 60% (5/3) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 40% (5/2) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (8/2) | 40% (5/2) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
David Nalbandian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
David Nalbandian
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
84)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerzy Janowicz
Player
David Nalbandian
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
11
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
10
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Marcel Granollers
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aljaz Bedene
Player
David Nalbandian
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Ferrer
Player
David Nalbandian
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Carlos Berlocq
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
David Nalbandian
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Simone Bolelli
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
11
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Nicolas Almagro
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
5
Aces
28
6
Double Faults
4
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
30%
(
32 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
31 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Nalbandian
Player
Guido Pella
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jarkko Nieminen | David Nalbandian |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 58% (574/409) | 67% (460/223) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1408/1109) | 63% (1148/666) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (12634/11470) | 54% (9406/7875) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 52% (158/143) | 65% (149/81) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (202/120) | 67% (193/95) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (187/114) | 73% (87/33) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 46% (27/32) | 69% (31/14) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 1850 | 1387 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 1180 | 1161 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 522.76 | 453.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (29581/44936) | 59% (16768/28473) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (20221/29561) | 70% (11731/16768) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7706/15364) | 52% (6097/11724) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1744/4112) | 43% (1339/3092) |
| Return Points Win % | 38% (16915/44087) | 41% (12076/29284) |
| Slam W/L | 53% (59/53) | 71% (89/37) |
| Masters W/L | 47% (75/85) | 63% (117/69) |
| Cups W/L | 81% (42/10) | 79% (23/6) |
| Main Tour W/L | 56% (270/211) | 68% (163/77) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Challenger W/L | 73% (126/47) | 70% (60/26) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (475/820) | 66% (347/523) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (93/155) | 71% (110/155) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (198/364) | 58% (138/238) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (185/330) | 55% (115/209) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (559/472) | 86% (436/376) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (559/86) | 14% (436/59) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (424/99) | 34% (247/83) |
See recent tennis photos of Nieminen and Nalbandian
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
