Prediction of Janis Graski vs Patrick Jozwicki Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
31% (8-18)
Career Total W/L
40% (10-15)
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| stats | Janis Graski | Patrick Jozwicki |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 3 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Break Points Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Janis Graski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Mikhail Korovin
Player
Janis Graski
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Janis Graski
Player
Enrico Baldisserri
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Janis Graski
44%
(
28 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Gundacker
Player
Janis Graski
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Jozwicki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Patrick Jozwicki
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
48 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(4) 5-7 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Patrick Jozwicki
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alessandro Spadola
Player
Patrick Jozwicki
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Janis Graski | Patrick Jozwicki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 31% (8/18) | 40% (10/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 34% (20/39) | 41% (24/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (243/329) | 48% (280/299) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 31% (8/18) | 44% (7/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.01 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 | 0.1 |
| Total Double Faults | 10 | 27 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 123.31 | 54.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (185/304) | 62% (315/511) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (99/185) | 50% (159/315) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (50/119) | 37% (73/196) |
| Break Points Won% (Total) | 48% (11/23) | 46% (24/52) |
| Return Points Win% | 38% (109/289) | 43% (207/480) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 31% (8/18) | 40% (10/15) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win% | 31% (8/26) | 40% (10/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 43% (3/7) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (7/6) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (7/1) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (19/2) | 13% (16/2) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
