Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jana Fett vs Veronica Cepede Royg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fett vs Royg analysis and find out who is favored!
Jana Fett vs Veronica Cepede Royg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fett has won 43.36% of points on his second serve, while Royg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fett, in recent form, has won 62.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Royg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.46% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fett has saved 56.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Royg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fett has won 65.52% of matches played (W/L 38/ 20), with Royg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 111/ 64), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 89/ 71). Royg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 282/ 137), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Fett has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.45% of matches (W/L 31/ 13), where as Royg has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fett winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fett winning 4 and Royg winning 1. The last match between Fett and Royg was at the Hobart International - Hobart, 08-01-2017, Q3, Hard with Jana Fett getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fett and Royg have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fett winning 1 times and Royg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fett winning 0, and Royg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fett has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.64 while Royg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fett has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Royg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fett has converted 49.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Royg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fett 2 - 0 Royg
148
Rank
97
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
892
Rank
73
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
59% (341-233)
Career Total W/L
61% (428-279)
63% (12-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$384,128
Career Prize Money
$490,909
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jana Fett | Veronica Cepede Royg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:2 | 1:33:2 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (83/147) | 61% (82/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (60/83) | 61% (50/82) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (29/64) | 45% (24/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (9/20) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (61/135) | 39% (58/147) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Jana Fett
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
51%
(
43 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jana Fett | Veronica Cepede Royg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (27/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (213/170) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.37 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (850/1273) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (512/850) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (184/423) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (98/203) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (668/1337) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (12/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Jana Fett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Jana Fett
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Ipek Oz
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Panna Udvardy
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Nigina Abduraimova
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Jana Fett
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
22 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Veronica Cepede Royg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
80
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
67%
(
84 of
125)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
77
Total Points Won
82
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
47 of
57)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Sofia Da Cruz Mendonca
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
12
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Veronica Cepede Royg
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fett Vs Royg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
