Jan-Lennard Struff vs Tallon Griekspoor Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L L L L L
Form
L W W W L W W W W LHead-to-head: Struff 0 - 3 Griekspoor
They have played 10 sets in total, with Struff winning 3 and Griekspoor winning 7. The last match between Struff and Griekspoor was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 18-02-2025, First, Hard with Tallon Griekspoor getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-6(7).
Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha(18-02-2025)
7
6
7
6
27% (3-8)
YTD Win/Loss
65% (11-6)
0
Head-to-Head
3
49
Ranking
34
21
Highest Rank
21
34
Age
28
R
Plays
R
13
Titles
20
57% (578-435)
Career Total W/L
62% (406-244)
$5,247,770
Career Prize Money
$3,707,170
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
2
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
1
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomova VS McNally PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Kvitova VS Kenin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Struff VS Griekspoor H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
8
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
25
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
21 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
26 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 2-6 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
68%
(
122 of
180)
1st Serve %
48%
(
78 of
161)
30
Aces
25
7
Double Faults
16
75%
(
92 of
122)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
63 of
78)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
34%
(
61 of
180)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
53 of
161)
172
Total Points Won
169
|
||||
Struff VS Griekspoor H2H Stats
Stats
0
H2H Matches
3
3
Sets Won
7
55
Games Won
59
48
Aces (Total)
63
18
Total Double Faults
13
2:35:11
Average Match Time
2:35:11
60% (212/356)
1st Serve %
69% (252/367)
77% (163/212)
1st Serve Win %
78% (196/252)
56% (80/144)
2nd Serve Win %
53% (61/115)
19% (5/27)
Break Points Won % (Total)
33% (6/18)
30% (110/367)
Return Points Win %
32% (113/356)
0% (0/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
25% (1/4)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
75% (3/4)
0% (0/2)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (2/2)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Tallon Griekspoor Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jan-Lennard Struff 0 - 3 Tallon Griekspoor
Insights for the upcoming tennis match:
Analysing the predictions for the forthcoming tennis match, various factors can be taken into account to determine the potential outcome. These include the recent form of the players, statistical correlations, performance under pressure, player levels, head-to-head matches, and opponent quality.
Recent form and second serve performance:
Over the past six months, it has been observed that Struff has exhibited a second serve performance of 47.09% points won while Griekspoor has demonstrated a slightly better performance with 49.72% points won. This statistic holds a noteworthy correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Recent form and return game stats:
Taking into account recent form, Struff has won 52.88% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Griekspoor achieved a winning percentage of 44.32%. In terms of first serve returns, the stats stand at 25% and 23.77% for Struff and Griekspoor, respectively. These statistics have a profound association with determining the favored player in their head-to-head encounter.
Performance under pressure analysis:
When it comes to saving breakpoints under pressure, Struff has the ability to save 57.26% of breakpoints, compared to Griekspoor's 68.18%. This statistical insight proves to be quite useful for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview:
In the past year, Struff has secured victory in 58% of the matches they played (29 wins and 21 losses), while Griekspoor has a 50% win rate (29 wins and 29 losses). This provides an overall picture of their head-to-head prediction for this upcoming match.
Best surface performance:
Struff's winning percentage on clay, their best career surface, stands at 62% (272 wins and 168 losses). However, on grass, their performance drops slightly with a winning percentage of 45% (28 wins and 34 losses). On the other hand, Griekspoor excels on grass with a 65% winning rate (22 wins and 12 losses), but struggles on indoor hard courts, with a winning percentage of 55% (69 wins and 56 losses).
Player level:
Examining the player levels over the past year, Struff primarily participated in matches on the main tour, achieving a 62.5% win rate (15 wins and 9 losses). Conversely, Griekspoor also predominantly played on the main tour, recording a 54.17% win rate (13 wins and 11 losses). Hence, it is crucial to compare the statistics between players considering the event levels they have been competing at in order to predict the favorite.
Direct head-to-head matches:
In their previous encounters, Struff and Griekspoor have faced each other twice, resulting in Struff being unsuccessful in obtaining victory, while Griekspoor has emerged triumphant both times. In total, they have contested eight sets, with Struff winning three and Griekspoor winning five. Their most recent match took place at the Davis Cup, World Group, SF, GER-NED on November 22, 2024, where Griekspoor secured a triumph with a scoreline of 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4.
Head-to-head match duration:
Historically, the average match duration between these players in head-to-head encounters has been 2 hours, 49 minutes, and 30 seconds.
Deciding set predictions:
When it comes to playing deciding sets, Struff and Griekspoor have encountered this scenario twice before. Regrettably, Struff failed to secure a win on both occasions, while Griekspoor emerged victorious twice. This insight provides valuable information for predicting the outcome if the match goes the distance.
Head-to-head in extreme pressure situations:
In their past battles, Struff and Griekspoor have contested two tiebreaks, resulting in one win for Struff and one win for Griekspoor.
Opponent quality statistics:
Over the last twelve months, Struff has competed against opponents with an average rank of 79.12, while Griekspoor has faced players with an average rank of 72.91.
Deciding set performance versus all players:
Considering the statistics of deciding sets, Struff has emerged victorious in 41% of matches played within the last year, while Griekspoor has a higher success rate of 48% in all matches played on the tour. These figures offer valuable insights for in-game live betting predictions, particularly if the match extends to a deciding set.
Current event head-to-head stats:
While past player performances are significant indicators for predicting tennis matches, it is crucial to also examine the current event stats to gain an understanding of the in-form players. For this purpose, please refer to the section below (if the players have competed in the current event). Additionally, certain players tend to perform better at specific events, thus necessitating the consideration of such factors when making predictions.
Break point conversion:
In recent form, Struff has successfully converted 30.84% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Griekspoor has excelled with a conversion rate of 38.28% in breaking their opponent's serve. This statistic is particularly telling for in-game live betting tips whenever either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you have an interest in models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Jan-Lennard Struff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
8
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Hugo Grenier
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
16
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Manuel Guinard
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
97)
18
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
30 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
19
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
114)
123
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-0 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
14
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Tallon Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
19 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
16 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Alexander Zverev
67%
(
90 of
135)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
10
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
121
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
12
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Daniil Medvedev
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
5
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
115
|
2-6 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ugo Humbert
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
92 of
130)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
17
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
50 of
64)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
33%
(
43 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
35 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
79%
(
86 of
109)
23
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
64 of
72)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
68 of
86)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
16 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
28 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
57% (578/435)
Win/Loss
62% (406/244)
56% (1385/1104)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (928/645)
52% (12753/11575)
Games Win/Loss
53% (8073/7248)
47% (98/109)
Hard Win/Loss
65% (147/78)
62% (272/168)
Clay Win/Loss
64% (168/96)
59% (180/124)
Indoor Hard W/L
54% (69/58)
45% (28/34)
Grass Win/Loss
65% (22/12)
0.55
Aces Per Game
0.45
6585
Aces Total
3368
0.25
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
2982
Total Double Faults
1646
1:19:16
Average Match Time
1:29:18
448.52
Average Opponent Rank
396.58
56% (36073/63942)
1st Serve %
63% (26861/42334)
75% (27163/36073)
1st Serve Win %
72% (19413/26861)
51% (14089/27860)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (7963/15488)
39% (2186/5620)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (1546/3803)
37% (24121/64852)
Return Points Win %
37% (15833/42260)
48% (43/46)
Slam W/L
50% (25/25)
55% (73/59)
Masters W/L
45% (18/22)
59% (20/14)
Cups W/L
50% (11/11)
48% (153/169)
Main Tour W/L
58% (75/55)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
64% (188/104)
Challenger W/L
67% (116/57)
71% (99/41)
Futures W/L
69% (160/73)
58% (541/932)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
63% (382/603)
41% (31/75)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
45% (15/33)
49% (226/459)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
57% (159/279)
49% (175/355)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (137/241)
83% (577/477)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (396/334)
17% (577/100)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (396/61)
23% (436/100)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
28% (254/72)
See recent tennis photos of Struff and Griekspoor
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
