Jan Kupcic vs Lilian Marmousez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent form analysis reveals interesting insights for the upcoming tennis match between Kupcic and Marmousez. Here are some key statistics to consider:

1. Second serve performance: Over the past six months, Kupcic has achieved a 52.22% success rate on their second serve, while Marmousez has won 53.94% of points. This statistic has shown a significant correlation with match prediction accuracy.
2. Return game stats: Analyzing recent form, Kupcic has managed to win 48.56% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Marmousez has recorded a 52.2% success rate. Furthermore, Kupcic has achieved a 37.53% success rate on first serve returns, compared to Marmousez's 36.17%. These stats can often provide valuable insights into which player may have the advantage in this head-to-head matchup.
3. Under pressure analysis: In terms of saving breakpoints, Kupcic has demonstrated resilience by saving 54.08% of breakpoints in recent form. Conversely, Marmousez has saved 34.62%. This particular statistic holds significant importance for in-game betting predictions.
4. Performance overview: Looking at the last year's performance, Kupcic has won 67.69% of their matches (44 wins and 21 losses). On the other hand, Marmousez has achieved a slightly higher winning percentage of 75% (51 wins and 17 losses). These overall head-to-head statistics offer a comprehensive prediction overview.
5. Best surface: Assessing each player's win percentages on different surfaces, Kupcic has delivered their best performance on Hard courts, winning 65% of matches (24 wins and 13 losses). However, on Clay courts, their win percentage drops to 58% (80 wins and 58 losses). For Marmousez, their most successful surface is Hard courts, boasting a 63% win rate (43 wins and 25 losses). Conversely, their win percentage decreases to 42% (10 wins and 14 losses) on Indoor Hard courts.
6. Player level: In the past year, Kupcic has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, specifically those with a $10K prize, and has won 67.69% of their matches (44 wins and 21 losses). Meanwhile, Marmousez has also primarily participated in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, where they have achieved a higher success rate of 75% (48 wins and 16 losses). When evaluating player statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the competition level they have been exposed to.
7. Opponent quality stats: Throughout the last 12 months, Kupcic has faced opponents with an average rank of 199.55, while Marmousez has encountered players with an average rank of 400.22. These statistics shed light on the level of competition they have encountered.
8. Deciding set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, if this match reaches a deciding set, Kupcic has won 38% of deciding sets over the past 12 months. Conversely, Marmousez has recorded a 50% success rate in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide valuable insights for in-game betting decisions.
9. Current event H2H stats: While analyzing past player performance is valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics for an indication of the players' current form. Please refer to the section below (eventStats) for up-to-date performance statistics if either player has already played a match in the current event. Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players may exhibit better performances at specific events, and this should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
10. Break point conversion: Recent statistics reveal that Kupcic has successfully converted 47.46% of breakpoint opportunities, while Marmousez has managed to capitalize on 48.78% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These numbers offer a telling statistic for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
11. If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is an excellent resource to explore (Warning: Stats geeks only).