Jan Kupcic vs Lilian Marmousez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W W L
Form
W W L W L W L W W LH2H: Kupcic 0 - 1 Marmousez
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kupcic winning 0 and Marmousez winning 2. The last match between Kupcic and Marmousez was at the M15 Villena, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Lilian Marmousez getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jan Kupcic | 0 |
| Lilian Marmousez | 1 |
M15 Villena(19-02-2025)
6
2
6
3
| Kupcic | Stats | Marmousez |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (15-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (7-5) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | 398 |
| Highest Rank | 388 | |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 61% (125-81) | Career Total W/L | 60% (137-91) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Jan Kupcic
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:27:56 | Average Match Time | 1:27:56 |
| 69% (47/68) | 1st Serve % | 54% (26/48) |
| 55% (26/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 85% (22/26) |
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (13/22) |
| 0% (0/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 27% (13/48) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33/68) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jan Kupcic vs Lilian Marmousez Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jan Kupcic 0 - 1 Lilian Marmousez
Recent form analysis reveals interesting insights for the upcoming tennis match between Kupcic and Marmousez. Here are some key statistics to consider:
- Second serve performance: Over the past six months, Kupcic has achieved a 52.22% success rate on their second serve, while Marmousez has won 53.94% of points. This statistic has shown a significant correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats: Analyzing recent form, Kupcic has managed to win 48.56% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Marmousez has recorded a 52.2% success rate. Furthermore, Kupcic has achieved a 37.53% success rate on first serve returns, compared to Marmousez's 36.17%. These stats can often provide valuable insights into which player may have the advantage in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: In terms of saving breakpoints, Kupcic has demonstrated resilience by saving 54.08% of breakpoints in recent form. Conversely, Marmousez has saved 34.62%. This particular statistic holds significant importance for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Looking at the last year's performance, Kupcic has won 67.69% of their matches (44 wins and 21 losses). On the other hand, Marmousez has achieved a slightly higher winning percentage of 75% (51 wins and 17 losses). These overall head-to-head statistics offer a comprehensive prediction overview.
- Best surface: Assessing each player's win percentages on different surfaces, Kupcic has delivered their best performance on Hard courts, winning 65% of matches (24 wins and 13 losses). However, on Clay courts, their win percentage drops to 58% (80 wins and 58 losses). For Marmousez, their most successful surface is Hard courts, boasting a 63% win rate (43 wins and 25 losses). Conversely, their win percentage decreases to 42% (10 wins and 14 losses) on Indoor Hard courts.
- Player level: In the past year, Kupcic has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, specifically those with a $10K prize, and has won 67.69% of their matches (44 wins and 21 losses). Meanwhile, Marmousez has also primarily participated in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, where they have achieved a higher success rate of 75% (48 wins and 16 losses). When evaluating player statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the competition level they have been exposed to.
- Opponent quality stats: Throughout the last 12 months, Kupcic has faced opponents with an average rank of 199.55, while Marmousez has encountered players with an average rank of 400.22. These statistics shed light on the level of competition they have encountered.
- Deciding set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, if this match reaches a deciding set, Kupcic has won 38% of deciding sets over the past 12 months. Conversely, Marmousez has recorded a 50% success rate in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide valuable insights for in-game betting decisions.
- Current event H2H stats: While analyzing past player performance is valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics for an indication of the players' current form. Please refer to the section below (eventStats) for up-to-date performance statistics if either player has already played a match in the current event. Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players may exhibit better performances at specific events, and this should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
- Break point conversion: Recent statistics reveal that Kupcic has successfully converted 47.46% of breakpoint opportunities, while Marmousez has managed to capitalize on 48.78% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These numbers offer a telling statistic for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is an excellent resource to explore (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Jan Kupcic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ognjen Milic
Player
Jan Kupcic
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve %
62%
(
8 of
13)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
22
Total Points Won
12
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Kupcic
Player
Leonardo Ljubicic
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-7(6) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Jan Kupcic
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jan Kupcic
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Kupcic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Kupcic
Player
Pietro Romeo Scomparin
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Lilian Marmousez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 3-6 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Andrea Motta
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Giannicola Misasi
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Lilian Marmousez
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
40%
(
8 of
20)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
43%
(
3 of
7)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
16
Total Points Won
17
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Lilian Marmousez
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Antoine Vincent
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Lilian Marmousez
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve %
69%
(
18 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
31
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Justin Schlageter
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Julio Cesar Porras
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (125/81) | Win/Loss | 60% (137/90) |
| 60% (282/187) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (303/197) |
| 55% (2457/2034) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2477/2080) |
| 64% (27/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (46/27) |
| 59% (89/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (80/48) |
| 64% (9/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (11/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 242 | Aces Total | 669 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 249 | Total Double Faults | 481 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:30:49 |
| 233.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 216.35 |
| 63% (4367/6966) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7748/13112) |
| 64% (2797/4367) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5293/7748) |
| 48% (1254/2599) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2775/5364) |
| 48% (368/773) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (669/1515) |
| 43% (3006/7039) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5712/13552) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 61% (125/81) | Futures W/L | 61% (131/83) |
| 61% (123/202) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (135/214) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 47% (18/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (31/51) |
| 44% (27/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 89% (134/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (140/119) |
| 11% (134/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (140/19) |
| 8% (72/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (85/18) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Lilian Marmousez
View full predicted draw for Marmousez
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
