Jan Choinski vs Thiemo De Bakker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Choinski vs Bakker analysis and find out who is favored!
Jan Choinski vs Thiemo De Bakker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Choinski has won 50.08% of points on his second serve, while Bakker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Choinski, in recent form, has won 45.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bakker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.67% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Choinski has saved 59.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bakker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Choinski has won 46.38% of matches played (W/L 32/ 37), with Bakker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Choinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 192/ 115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11). Bakker has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Choinski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25), where as Bakker has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Choinski has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.07 while Bakker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Choinski has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bakker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Choinski has converted 39.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bakker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Choinski 0 - 0 Bakker
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jan Choinski | Thiemo De Bakker |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 27% (4/11) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 36% (13/23) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (167/185) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 30% (3/7) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.51 | N/A |
Aces Total | 88 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.15 | N/A |
DFs Total | 26 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:12 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 258.13 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 66% (759/1149) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 69% (526/759) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (200/390) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (28/71) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 33% (359/1089) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 25% (3/9) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (4/15) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | N/A |
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Jan Choinski
75%
(
77 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Jan Choinski
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jan Choinski
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
9
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
5
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
36 of
43)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Jan Choinski
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
15
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benoit Paire
Player
Jan Choinski
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jan Choinski
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
86 of
133)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
55 of
86)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
50 of
133)
119
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Jan Choinski
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
80%
(
71 of
89)
9
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jan Choinski
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
123)
18
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
8
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
123)
120
Total Points Won
100
|
6-1 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H |
view more