Jan Choinski vs Mark Lajal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W W L
Form
L L W L W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Choinski 0 - 1 Lajal
They have played 3 sets in total, with Choinski winning 1 and Lajal winning 2. The last match between Choinski and Lajal was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Mark Lajal getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jan Choinski | 0 |
| Mark Lajal | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
Mark Lajal
Jan Choinski
3
6
6
4
6
3
| Choinski | Stats | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (16-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (22-12) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 200 | Ranking | 168 |
| 126 | Highest Rank | 167 |
| 29 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 15 | Titles | 4 |
| 59% (396-280) | Career Total W/L | 61% (157-102) |
| $285,015 | Career Prize Money | $117,025 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Mark Lajal
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 15 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:57:0 | Average Match Time | 1:57:0 |
| 74% (63/85) | 1st Serve % | 68% (63/93) |
| 67% (42/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (44/63) |
| 55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (16/30) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 35% (33/93) | Return Points Win % | 36% (31/85) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Choinski vs Lajal Match Preview :
- How do Choinski and Lajal perform on their second serves recently? Lajal slightly edges out Choinski with 47.58% success compared to Choinski's 46.7%.
- Who has a stronger return game in recent form? Lajal again shows a slight advantage, winning 44.96% of second serve return points whereas Choinski has 42.62%.
- In the pressure situation of saving breakpoints, both players are nearly matched with Lajal saving 56.3% and Choinski close behind at 56.04%.
- Over the last year, Lajal has a higher match win percentage with 64.38% compared to Choinski’s 51.72%.
- Surface preference shows that Choinski excels on Clay with a 62% win rate, though Lajal succeeds on Grass with a 64% win rate.
- Both players primarily participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, but Lajal has the edge with a 63.64% win rate compared to Choinski's 52.94%.
- Both have nearly equal experiences against similarly ranked opponents but Lajal's competition had a marginally lower average rank of 245.56 to Choinski's 252.81.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Choinski has demonstrated stronger performance with a 60% win rate as opposed to Lajal's 52%.
- When looking at breakpoint conversion, Choinski shows a slight edge with a conversion rate of 37.36%, narrowly ahead of Lajal's 36.05%.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Choinski and Lajal promises to be closely contested, with both players exhibiting several strengths and similarities in their statistics.
Lajal shows a slightly better recent form in second serve performance and return games, complementing their overall higher match win percentage. Additionally, Lajal’s play against slightly stronger competition might aid in handling pressure situations effectively during this showdown.
Choinski, however, holds the advantage when it comes to deciding sets, showcasing resilience while converting breakpoints more successfully than Lajal. Additionally, Choinski’s performance on Clay, though not relevant to the current surface, points to versatility.
Ultimately, while both players demonstrate capable statistics across various facets of their game, Lajal seems to possess a slight upper hand overall. Based on recent form and comprehensive comparative analysis, Lajal is the most likely winner for this matchup.
Choinski vs Lajal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Jan Choinski
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Calvin Hemery
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
51 of
108)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Marco Trungelliti
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
64 of
120)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
11
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Harold Mayot
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Branko Djuric
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Theo Papamalamis
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Jan Choinski
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mark Lajal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Mark Lajal
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mark Lajal
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Laslo Djere
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Reilly Opelka
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
15 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Mark Lajal
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
9
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (396/280) | Win/Loss | 61% (157/102) |
| 57% (891/677) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (366/246) |
| 53% (7747/6898) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3148/2714) |
| 54% (60/52) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (89/49) |
| 62% (226/138) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) |
| 59% (104/73) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (45/30) |
| 26% (6/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1814 | Aces Total | 1252 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 965 | Total Double Faults | 798 |
| 1:21:1 | Average Match Time | 1:43:21 |
| 236.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 361.61 |
| 65% (25091/38434) | 1st Serve % | 64% (11622/18128) |
| 68% (17001/25091) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8270/11622) |
| 51% (6861/13343) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3274/6512) |
| 44% (1706/3913) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (761/1832) |
| 40% (15580/38596) | Return Points Win % | 40% (7351/18364) |
| 33% (6/12) | Slam W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 36% (10/18) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 53% (154/135) | Challenger W/L | 59% (88/60) |
| 67% (225/113) | Futures W/L | 66% (56/29) |
| 59% (384/656) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (154/254) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (98/190) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (50/89) |
| 52% (111/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (42/93) |
| 88% (380/335) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (154/131) |
| 12% (380/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (154/23) |
| 20% (295/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (105/27) |
Choinski vs. Lajal Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
