Jamie Loeb vs Monica Niculescu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Niculescu analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Monica Niculescu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 47.87% of points on his second serve, while Niculescu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Niculescu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 54.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niculescu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 50% of matches played (W/L 30/ 30), with Niculescu winning 100% (W/L 1/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Niculescu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 92/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28), where as Niculescu has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 100% of matches (W/L 1/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loeb winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Loeb winning 0 and Niculescu winning 2. The last match between Loeb and Niculescu was at the W100+H Nottingham, 13-06-2021, Q1 round, Grass with Monica Niculescu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Niculescu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Loeb winning 0 times and Niculescu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 0, and Niculescu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.1 while Niculescu has played against players with an average rank of 386.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niculescu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 47.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niculescu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loeb 0 - 1 Niculescu
11
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
289
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
687
Rank
28
High
36
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
11
Chall
0
Slam
3
Main
2
Minor
Form
55% (294-242)
Career Total W/L
57% (475-354)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$2,875,657
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jamie Loeb | Monica Niculescu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 7 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:0 | 1:45:0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (59/96) | 79% (50/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 54% (32/59) | 66% (33/50) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (16/37) | 54% (7/13) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 37% (23/63) | 50% (48/96) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
Monica Niculescu
Player
Jamie Loeb
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jamie Loeb | Monica Niculescu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 59% (32/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (272/222) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
Aces Total | 73 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
DFs Total | 70 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:18 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 344.04 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (855/1546) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (579/855) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (343/690) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/195) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (725/1594) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
SF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Monica Niculescu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Monica Niculescu
Player
Katrina Scott
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Monica Niculescu
Player
Emily Webley-Smith
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dalma Galfi
Player
Monica Niculescu
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Monica Niculescu
Player
Samantha Murray
77%
(
77 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Monica Niculescu
Player
Maddison Inglis
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Monica Niculescu
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
86%
(
51 of
59)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Monica Niculescu
Player
Kristie Ahn
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Monica Niculescu
Player
Asia Muhammad
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more