J. Loeb
To Win
K. Motosono
To Win
Jamie Loeb vs Lia Karatancheva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W W L L
Form
L W W W L W L L W LHead-to-head: Loeb 1 - 0 Karatancheva
They have played 3 sets in total, with Loeb winning 2 and Karatancheva winning 1. The last match between Loeb and Karatancheva was at the W75 Vero Beach, 22-01-2025, Q3, Clay with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3.
W75 Vero Beach(22-01-2025)
6
7
7
5
6
3
58% (7-5)
YTD Win/Loss
56% (9-7)
1
Head-to-Head
0
561
Ranking
343
132
Highest Rank
329
30
Age
21
R
Plays
-
11
Titles
0
53% (306-267)
Career Total W/L
52% (165-152)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
1
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
- / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Begu VS Sonobe PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Burrage PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Loeb VS Karatancheva H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Jamie Loeb
Player
Lia Karatancheva
56%
(
62 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
80 of
121)
0
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
5
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
35%
(
17 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
49 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
Loeb VS Karatancheva H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
19
Games Won
15
0
Aces (Total)
4
11
Total Double Faults
5
2:52:25
Average Match Time
2:52:25
56% (62/110)
1st Serve %
66% (80/121)
71% (44/62)
1st Serve Win %
55% (44/80)
35% (17/48)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (20/41)
42% (8/19)
Break Points Won % (Total)
55% (6/11)
47% (57/121)
Return Points Win %
45% (49/110)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Jamie Loeb
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Hina Inoue
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Maria Kozyreva
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
53%
(
40 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Makenna Jones
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Jamie Loeb
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
38%
(
11 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
59%
(
27 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
64
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Jamie Loeb
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Lia Karatancheva
56%
(
62 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
80 of
121)
0
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
5
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
35%
(
17 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
49 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Christina Rosca
49%
(
40 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aya El Aouni
Player
Jamie Loeb
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lia Karatancheva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Lia Karatancheva
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 6-7(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Barbora Michalkova
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
15 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
40
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Lia Karatancheva
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Angela Fita Boluda
Player
Lia Karatancheva
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Luisina Giovannini
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Lia Karatancheva
34%
(
20 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Christina Rosca
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Lia Karatancheva
56%
(
62 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
80 of
121)
0
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
5
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
35%
(
17 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
49 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (306/267)
Win/Loss
52% (165/152)
53% (699/621)
Sets Win/Loss
51% (363/343)
51% (6187/5918)
Games Win/Loss
51% (3357/3187)
57% (182/140)
Hard Win/Loss
49% (49/52)
51% (80/77)
Clay Win/Loss
54% (110/93)
52% (36/33)
Indoor Hard W/L
45% (5/6)
32% (8/17)
Grass Win/Loss
50% (1/1)
0.24
Aces Per Game
0.1
1411
Aces Total
307
0.28
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
1643
Total Double Faults
691
1:17:34
Average Match Time
1:11:7
499.52
Average Opponent Rank
400.8
54% (16627/30834)
1st Serve %
60% (8920/14825)
65% (10774/16627)
1st Serve Win %
58% (5169/8920)
46% (6541/14206)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (2685/5905)
47% (1669/3544)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (887/1813)
44% (13651/31378)
Return Points Win %
47% (6720/14371)
46% (16/19)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
38% (3/5)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
71% (5/2)
41% (21/30)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
53% (239/210)
Challenger W/L
52% (119/108)
90% (27/3)
Futures W/L
50% (41/41)
53% (302/567)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
52% (162/313)
67% (2/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
45% (51/113)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (36/64)
49% (86/174)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (40/76)
83% (323/269)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (162/138)
16% (323/53)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (162/24)
15% (250/37)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (155/26)
See recent tennis photos of Loeb and Karatancheva
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
