Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jamie Loeb vs Elizabeth Coleman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Coleman analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Elizabeth Coleman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 47.87% of points on his second serve, while Coleman has won 41.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coleman has won 57.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.9% and 40.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 54.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coleman has saved 16.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 50% of matches played (W/L 30/ 30), with Coleman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Coleman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28), where as Coleman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loeb winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Loeb winning 2 and Coleman winning 0. The last match between Loeb and Coleman was at the Dow Tennis Classic - Midland, 30-10-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Jamie Loeb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Coleman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Loeb winning 0 times and Coleman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 0, and Coleman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.1 while Coleman has played against players with an average rank of 253.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coleman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 47.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coleman has converted 100% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 0 Coleman
295
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
55% (294-242)
Career Total W/L
33% (7-14)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Elizabeth Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:52 | 1:46:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (46/73) | 67% (54/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (31/46) | 57% (31/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 48% (13/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (37/81) | 37% (27/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Jamie Loeb
Player
Elizabeth Coleman
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Elizabeth Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (32/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (272/222) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 73 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:18 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 344.04 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (855/1546) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (579/855) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (343/690) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/195) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (725/1594) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Coleman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Elizabeth Coleman
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Elizabeth Coleman
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raveena Kingsley
Player
Elizabeth Coleman
92%
(
44 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
100%
(
4 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Coleman
Player
Anita Sahdiieva
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Coleman
Player
Helena Narmont
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Loeb Vs Coleman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
