Jamie Loeb vs Chieh-Yu Hsu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Loeb vs C. Hsu

Jamie Loeb
USA
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
30
Age
33
1.68m
Height
-
537
C. Rank
756
132
Best Rank
224
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$226.3K
Career Money
$6.4K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-

Chieh-Yu Hsu
TPE
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
30
Age
33
1.68m
Height
-
537
C. Rank
756
132
Best Rank
224
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$226.3K
Career Money
$6.4K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 1 Hsu
They have played 5 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 3 and Chieh-Yu Hsu winning 2. The last match between Jamie Loeb and Chieh-Yu Hsu was at the Baton Rouge, 21-06-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loeb | 1 |
| Hsu | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Baton Rouge(06-21-16)
Jamie Loeb
7
6
Chieh-Yu Hsu
6
3
(R1) Lexington(07-21-14)
Chieh-Yu Hsu
1
6
6
Jamie Loeb
6
0
4
J. Loeb vs C. Hsu H2H Profile
J. Loeb vs C. Hsu Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jamie Loeb has won 38.59% of points on their second serve, while Chieh-Yu Hsu has won 28.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jamie Loeb, in recent form, has won 53.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chieh-Yu Hsu has won 57.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.20% and 28.00% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jamie Loeb has saved 53.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chieh-Yu Hsu has saved 38.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jamie Loeb has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 25/16), with Chieh-Yu Hsu winning 42.86% (W/L 3/4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jamie Loeb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 190/143), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/17). Chieh-Yu Hsu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 28/24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Jamie Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.53% of matches (W/L 23/15), where as Chieh-Yu Hsu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 2/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jamie Loeb winning 1 times and Chieh-Yu Hsu being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 3 and Chieh-Yu Hsu winning 2.
- The last match between Jamie Loeb and Chieh-Yu Hsu was at the Baton Rouge, 21-06-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jamie Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 405.85 while Chieh-Yu Hsu has played against players with an average rank of 248.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jamie Loeb has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chieh-Yu Hsu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jamie Loeb has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chieh-Yu Hsu has converted 55.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jamie Loeb vs Chieh-Yu Hsu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Loeb vs C. Hsu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 22 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:57:30 | Average Match Time | 0:57:30 |
| 56% (38/68) | 1st Serve % | 56% (40/72) |
| 79% (30/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 53% (16/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 44% (32/72) | Return Points Win % | 32% (22/68) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Loeb 45%, Hsu 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Loeb 55%, Hsu 69%.
Break Points Saved %: Loeb 58%, Hsu 46%.
J. Loeb Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 5-7 6-4 3-1 ret. | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R3 | L | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 2-6 6-4 | ||
C. Hsu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 2-0 ret. | ||

J. Loeb vs C. Hsu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.91% (324/277) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.40% (371/380) |
| 53.36% (739/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.76% (839/847) |
| 51.27% (6503/6180) | Games Win/Loss | 50.23% (7572/7502) |
| 57.06% (190/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.05% (242/232) |
| 51.72% (90/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.73% (100/114) |
| 52.17% (36/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.15% (29/30) |
| 32.00% (8/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1472 | Aces Total | 509 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1745 | Total Double Faults | 925 |
| 1:18:23 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 516.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 588.52 |
| 54% (17485/32413) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15062/25034) |
| 65% (11351/17485) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (8829/15062) |
| 46% (6867/14927) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4542/9971) |
| 47% (1765/3778) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1446/3000) |
| 44% (14442/33101) | Return Points Win % | 46% (11106/24377) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 42.59% (23/31) | Main Tour W/L | 40.91% (9/13) |
| 53.80% (255/219) | Challenger W/L | 45.69% (244/290) |
| 90.00% (27/3) | Futures W/L | 62.77% (118/70) |
| 54% (320/593) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (364/742) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 45% (54/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (53/116) |
| 50% (92/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (87/189) |
| 83% (344/287) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (384/325) |
| 16% (344/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (384/59) |
| 14% (257/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (367/46) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction06:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction05:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction04:03 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
04:03
H2H 0-0
05:05
H2H 0-0
05:05
H2H 0-0
05:30
H2H 0-0
07:00
H2H 0-0