Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jamie Lau vs Monique Barry Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lau vs Barry analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Lau vs Monique Barry Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lau has won 26.15% of points on his second serve, while Barry has won 43.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lau, in recent form, has won 53.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Barry has won 51.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.44% and 41.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lau has saved 45.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barry has saved 50.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lau has won 15.38% of matches played (W/L 2/ 11), with Barry winning 51.06% (W/L 24/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lau has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 22% (W/L 5/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Barry has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 34/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Lau has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/ 7), where as Barry has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lau has played against opponents with an average rank of 38.92 while Barry has played against players with an average rank of 166.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lau has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barry has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lau has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barry has converted 48.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lau 0 - 0 Barry
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
634
Rank
597
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
18% (5-23)
Career Total W/L
49% (55-58)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
56% (10-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jamie Lau | Monique Barry |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 56% (10/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 53% (21/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 39% (19/30) | 53% (185/163) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:13:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 227.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (42/72) | 62% (573/918) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (23/42) | 62% (354/573) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (12/30) | 44% (153/345) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (5/12) | 43% (52/121) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (40/78) | 45% (439/983) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 60% (9/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 56% (10/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Jamie Lau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Olivia Quigley
Player
Jamie Lau
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanni Liu
Player
Jamie Lau
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Jamie Lau
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Susannah Su
Player
Jamie Lau
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
52%
(
34 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Monique Barry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Monique Barry
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Alicia Smith
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Sakura Hosogi
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
49%
(
45 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Monique Barry
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Petra Hule
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Belle Thompson
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
71 of
123)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
14
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
123)
112
Total Points Won
97
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Monique Barry
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monique Barry
Player
Belle Thompson
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lau Vs Barry Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
