MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

James Watt vs Gerard Campana Lee Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Watt 1 - 0 Lee

They have played 2 sets in total, with Watt winning 2 and Lee winning 0. The last match between Watt and Lee was at the Tunis Challenger, 11-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with James Watt getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
James Watt 1
Gerard Campana Lee 0

LAST H2H MATCH: Tunis Challenger(11-05-2025)

flag
flag
6 3
6 4
Watt vs Lee H2H Profile
Watt Stats Lee
40% (6-9) YTD Win/Loss 44% (12-15)
1 Head-to-Head 0
719 Ranking 449
713 Highest Rank 318
25 Age 20
- Plays -
0 Titles 1
49% (43-44) Career Total W/L 51% (77-74)
$0 Career Prize Money $0
1 Clay H2H 0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Thompson VS Diallo PREDICTION Grass

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp

11 Jun 2025 / Second

ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE

Gabriel Diallo

To Win

54.14 %
10.47%

Birrell VS Yuan PREDICTION Grass

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch wta

11 Jun 2025 / Second

ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE

Yue Yuan

To Win

74.19 %
28.32%

Watt VS Lee H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-4
cross
James Watt
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66% ( 43 of 65)
1st Serve %
58% ( 38 of 65)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65% ( 28 of 43)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 23 of 38)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 23 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 65)
69
Total Points Won
61

Watt VS Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Watt Vs Lee H2H Stats
James Watt Watt Stats Gerard Campana Lee Lee
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 7
6 Aces (Total) 0
1 Total Double Faults 2
1:19:55 Average Match Time 1:19:55
66% (43/65) 1st Serve % 58% (38/65)
65% (28/43) 1st Serve Win % 61% (23/38)
64% (14/22) 2nd Serve Win % 56% (15/27)
43% (3/7) Break Points Won % (Total) 25% (1/4)
42% (27/65) Return Points Win % 35% (23/65)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Watt vs Lee Match Preview :

  • Who has the edge in second serve performance over the last six months? Watt has been slightly better, winning 46.47% of points, compared to Lee's 43.02%.
  • In return game proficiency, Lee has shown superior skill, capturing 52.22% of their opponent's second serve points, surpassing Watt's 38.78%. Lee also edges out in first serve returns with 29.28% over Watt's 22.97%.
  • Under pressure, Watt has demonstrated a stronger breakpoint defense by saving 64.96%, compared to Lee's 49.74%, an important factor in tight situations.
  • How evenly matched are their overall performances in the past year? Both have won 50% of their matches, with Lee having a record of 30/30 and Watt at 24/24.
  • Lee excels on clay with a 53% career win rate, while Watt performs best on grass, achieving a 56% win rate. Their weakest performances are on I.hard for Lee and hard courts for Watt.
  • Assessing their past competitive level, Lee has achieved a 50.94% win rate in Challengers/ITF tournaments, while Watt holds a 51.35% win rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF events.
  • Considering opponent quality, Watt has faced stiffer competition with an average opponent rank of 119.29, compared to Lee's 212.03.
  • If reaching a deciding set, Watt has a slight advantage, having won 50% of such sets over the last year, against Lee's 46%.
  • In terms of breakpoint conversion in recent form, Lee has been more efficient, converting 31.33% of opportunities, while Watt stands at 28.81%.

Editorial Prediction (May 11, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming tennis match looms, a close contest is expected given the nearly even win rates of Lee and Watt over the past year. Both players exhibit distinct strengths, making this an intriguing matchup.

Watt shows a slight advantage in second serve performance and demonstrates stronger resilience under pressure, saving more breakpoints than Lee. This factor could prove pivotal in tight match situations.

Lee, however, has a pronounced edge in the return game, especially against second serves, and shows greater breakpoint conversion efficiency, suggesting an ability to disrupt Watt’s service games effectively.

Considering the quality of opponents faced, Watt has experience competing against higher-ranked players, which may prepare them better for challenging scenarios.

While Watt might capitalize on their performance advantage under pressure, Lee’s superior return game and efficiency in converting breakpoints build a strong case for their victory. Thus, Lee is most likely to emerge as the winner in this anticipated tennis showdown.

Watt vs Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88

James Watt Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Moez Echargui
Player
James Watt
59% ( 44 of 74)
1st Serve %
67% ( 40 of 60)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
77% ( 34 of 44)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 30 of 40)
53% ( 16 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
32% ( 24 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 21 of 60)
71
Total Points Won
63
L
7-6(5) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
James Watt
Player
Stefano Travaglia
69% ( 71 of 103)
1st Serve %
56% ( 48 of 86)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
76% ( 54 of 71)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 38 of 48)
44% ( 14 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 15 of 38)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
34% ( 35 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 33 of 86)
101
Total Points Won
88
W
4-6 6-3 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
James Watt
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66% ( 43 of 65)
1st Serve %
58% ( 38 of 65)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65% ( 28 of 43)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 23 of 38)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 23 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 65)
69
Total Points Won
61
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Mili Poljicak
Player
James Watt
55% ( 46 of 84)
1st Serve %
64% ( 67 of 104)
6
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
85% ( 39 of 46)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 47 of 67)
63% ( 24 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 20 of 37)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
25% ( 21 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 37 of 104)
100
Total Points Won
88
L
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Alfredo Perez
Player
James Watt
64% ( 43 of 67)
1st Serve %
60% ( 49 of 81)
5
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
7
74% ( 32 of 43)
1st Serve Won
84% ( 41 of 49)
88% ( 21 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 11 of 32)
14% ( 1 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 5)
21% ( 14 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 29 of 81)
82
Total Points Won
66
L
6-4 7-6(3) H2H
QF
cross
James Watt
Player
Mark Whitehouse
69% ( 31 of 45)
1st Serve %
57% ( 30 of 53)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
81% ( 25 of 31)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 18 of 30)
64% ( 9 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 9 of 23)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 11 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 26 of 53)
60
Total Points Won
38
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
James Watt
Player
Jesse Flores
53% ( 30 of 57)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
90% ( 27 of 30)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 29 of 39)
56% ( 15 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 8 of 23)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
26% ( 15 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 25 of 62)
67
Total Points Won
52
W
6-1 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Blake Ellis
Player
James Watt
57% ( 62 of 109)
1st Serve %
70% ( 70 of 100)
11
Aces
21
5
Double Faults
4
79% ( 49 of 62)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 55 of 70)
55% ( 26 of 47)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 18 of 30)
20% ( 1 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
31% ( 34 of 109)
Rtn Points Won
27% ( 27 of 100)
102
Total Points Won
107
L
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3) H2H

Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
60% ( 53 of 88)
1st Serve %
80% ( 71 of 89)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
81% ( 43 of 53)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 43 of 71)
37% ( 13 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 11 of 18)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
100% ( 4 of 4)
36% ( 32 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 35 of 89)
91
Total Points Won
86
L
3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Alexander Weis
77% ( 66 of 86)
1st Serve %
57% ( 38 of 67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67% ( 44 of 66)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 26 of 38)
45% ( 9 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
18% ( 2 of 11)
38% ( 33 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 30 of 67)
83
Total Points Won
70
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Masamichi Imamura
74% ( 35 of 47)
1st Serve %
62% ( 42 of 68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86% ( 30 of 35)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 26 of 42)
92% ( 11 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
13% ( 6 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 28 of 68)
69
Total Points Won
46
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Petr Brunclik
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
59% ( 36 of 61)
1st Serve %
70% ( 32 of 46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64% ( 23 of 36)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
56% ( 14 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 7 of 14)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
39% ( 24 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 23 of 46)
60
Total Points Won
47
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Sandro Kopp
75% ( 46 of 61)
1st Serve %
68% ( 36 of 53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74% ( 34 of 46)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
28% ( 17 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 21 of 53)
65
Total Points Won
49
W
7-5 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
54% ( 57 of 106)
1st Serve %
63% ( 74 of 117)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72% ( 41 of 57)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 38 of 74)
39% ( 19 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 20 of 43)
37% ( 7 of 19)
Break Points Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
43% ( 46 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 59 of 117)
119
Total Points Won
104
L
6-4 5-7 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Stefan Micov
53% ( 35 of 66)
1st Serve %
36% ( 23 of 64)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
69% ( 24 of 35)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 16 of 23)
55% ( 17 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 16 of 41)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
38% ( 25 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 32 of 64)
73
Total Points Won
57
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
James Watt
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66% ( 43 of 65)
1st Serve %
58% ( 38 of 65)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65% ( 28 of 43)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 23 of 38)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 23 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 65)
69
Total Points Won
61
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Watt & Lee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
James Watt Watt Stats Gerard Campana Lee Lee
49% (43/44) Win/Loss 51% (77/74)
51% (104/99) Sets Win/Loss 52% (182/170)
52% (1065/990) Games Win/Loss 51% (1719/1679)
48% (34/37) Hard Win/Loss 43% (6/8)
57% (4/3) Clay Win/Loss 53% (71/63)
0% (0/0) Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/3)
56% (5/4) Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0)
0.66 Aces Per Game 0.17
660 Aces Total 284
0.16 Double Faults Per Game 0.31
160 Total Double Faults 518
1:25:43 Average Match Time 1:46:55
396.63 Average Opponent Rank 385.8
72% (3692/5144) 1st Serve % 62% (6226/10054)
74% (2720/3692) 1st Serve Win % 64% (4007/6226)
53% (763/1452) 2nd Serve Win % 49% (1860/3828)
34% (151/449) Break Points Won % (Total) 46% (469/1021)
36% (1961/5426) Return Points Win % 42% (4077/9777)
0% (0/0) Cups W/L 0% (0/1)
50% (7/7) Challenger W/L 48% (51/55)
49% (36/37) Futures W/L 59% (26/18)
49% (41/84) Best of 3 Sets Win % 51% (76/149)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
34% (12/35) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 49% (18/37)
41% (13/32) Deciding Set Win % 44% (22/50)
77% (47/36) 1st Set Won, Won Match 78% (86/67)
23% (47/11) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 22% (86/19)
20% (40/8) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 15% (65/10)

Watt vs. Lee Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch

flag
12 Jun
flag
12:00
Prediction

Boss Open - Stuttgart

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...