J. Watt
To Win
B. Ellis
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L L L LForm
W W L W W W L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Watt winning 0 and Langmo winning 2. The last match between Watt and Langmo was at the M25 Timaru, 12-02-2025, First, Hard with Christian Langmo getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
M25 Timaru(12-02-2025)
19 Mar 2025 / First
19 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
James Watt
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matthew Hulme
Player
James Watt
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
5
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
48 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
12 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
James Watt
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
5 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
James Watt
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jake Delaney
Player
James Watt
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
James Watt
Player
Jacob Brumm
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
James Watt
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
70 of
97)
3
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
James Watt
Player
Kousuke Ogura
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
17
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sam Wensley
Player
James Watt
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
14 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
8 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
25
Total Points Won
28
|
4-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Fishback
Player
James Watt
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
James Watt
Player
Kai Milburn
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Seongbin Sim
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more