search

James Ward vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ward vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

James Ward vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Ward 1 - 0 Zandschulp

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ward has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 46.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ward, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Ward has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Ward has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zandschulp winning 47.27% (W/L 26/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Ward has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 219/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 60). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ward winning 1 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ward winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Ward and Zandschulp was at the cinch Championships - London, 12-06-2021, Q1 round, Grass with James Ward getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(4).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:1.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Ward and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ward winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ward winning 1, and Zandschulp 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ward has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 175.29.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ward has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Ward has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
James Ward

9

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

5

Minor

Ret.

Rank

89

High

37

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

99

Rank

22

High

28

Age

R

Plays

Botic Van De Zandschulp

7

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

5

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

W L L L W L L L W L

Form

L L W W W L W L L L

52% (402-374)

Career Total W/L

63% (332-199)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

40% (12-18)

$460,450

Career Prize Money

$2,900,825

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For James Ward vs Botic Van De Zandschulp For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ward VS Zandschulp

Ward VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats James Ward Botic Van De Zandschulp
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 17 14
Aces (Total) 9 7
DFs Total 4 9
Avg Match Time 2:9:1 2:9:1
1st Serve % 58% (51/88) 58% (61/106)
1st Serve Win% 78% (40/51) 77% (47/61)
2nd Serve Win% 49% (18/37) 36% (16/45)
BPs Won% (Total) 40% (4/10) 75% (3/4)
Return Points W% 41% (43/106) 34% (30/88)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Ward VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 4-6 7-6(4)
cross
James Ward
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58% ( 51 of 88)
1st Serve %
58% ( 61 of 106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
78% ( 40 of 51)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 47 of 61)
49% ( 18 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 16 of 45)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
34% ( 30 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 43 of 106)
101
Total Points Won
93

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats James Ward Botic Van De Zandschulp
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 40% (12/18)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 41% (28/41)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 47% (314/360)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 36% (4/7)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 47% (7/8)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 33% (1/2)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/1)
Aces pg 0 0.4
Aces Total 0 130
DFs per game 0 0.3
DFs Total 0 98
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1:47:50
Avg Opp Rank 0 181.13
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 62% (1326/2130)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 68% (906/1326)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 46% (372/804)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 39% (74/191)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 38% (817/2138)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/2)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 50% (5/5)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 50% (1/1)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 38% (5/8)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 33% (1/2)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 44% (12/27)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/2)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 50% (7/14)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 50% (4/8)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 92% (12/11)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 8% (12/1)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 6% (18/1)

James Ward Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
James Ward
57% ( 33 of 58)
1st Serve %
70% ( 43 of 61)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 27 of 43)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 19 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 29 of 61)
68
Total Points Won
51
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
James Ward
Player
Illya Marchenko
73% ( 47 of 64)
1st Serve %
56% ( 35 of 62)
17
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
81% ( 38 of 47)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 26 of 35)
71% ( 12 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
22% ( 14 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 21 of 62)
71
Total Points Won
55
W
6-3 7-6(1) H2H
R1
cross
Alexis Galarneau
Player
James Ward
49% ( 25 of 51)
1st Serve %
62% ( 36 of 58)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
84% ( 21 of 25)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
18% ( 4 of 22)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
31% ( 16 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 31 of 58)
66
Total Points Won
43
L
7-6(1) 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Vasek Pospisil
Player
James Ward
66% ( 33 of 50)
1st Serve %
62% ( 41 of 66)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
91% ( 30 of 33)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 30 of 41)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
18% ( 9 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 26 of 66)
67
Total Points Won
49
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Illya Marchenko
Player
James Ward
45% ( 33 of 73)
1st Serve %
61% ( 42 of 69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 26 of 42)
55% ( 22 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
38% ( 28 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 31 of 69)
76
Total Points Won
66
L
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
James Ward
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58% ( 51 of 88)
1st Serve %
58% ( 61 of 106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
78% ( 40 of 51)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 47 of 61)
49% ( 18 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 16 of 45)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
34% ( 30 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 43 of 106)
101
Total Points Won
93
W
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Marius Copil
Player
James Ward
51% ( 30 of 59)
1st Serve %
60% ( 59 of 99)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
90% ( 27 of 30)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 41 of 59)
76% ( 22 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 21 of 40)
15% ( 2 of 13)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
17% ( 10 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 37 of 99)
86
Total Points Won
72
L
6-3 7-6(9) H2H
Q1
cross
Kevin King
Player
James Ward
51% ( 33 of 65)
1st Serve %
59% ( 37 of 63)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
88% ( 29 of 33)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 25 of 37)
53% ( 17 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
29% ( 19 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 25 of 63)
71
Total Points Won
57
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
W
2-6 6-3 10-8 H2H
R1
L
4-6 7-6(5) 10-7 H2H

Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67% ( 57 of 85)
1st Serve %
55% ( 51 of 92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63% ( 36 of 57)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 37 of 51)
46% ( 13 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 12 of 41)
35% ( 6 of 17)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
42% ( 36 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 43 of 92)
92
Total Points Won
85
L
6-4 4-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59% ( 50 of 85)
1st Serve %
54% ( 41 of 76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74% ( 37 of 50)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 24 of 41)
51% ( 18 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 10 of 35)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
35% ( 30 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 42 of 76)
97
Total Points Won
64
L
6-1 6-1 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47% ( 36 of 77)
1st Serve %
64% ( 48 of 75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58% ( 21 of 36)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 29 of 48)
61% ( 25 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 8 of 27)
58% ( 7 of 12)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
40% ( 31 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 38 of 75)
84
Total Points Won
68
L
6-2 4-6 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve %
60% ( 30 of 50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83% ( 20 of 24)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
28% ( 10 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
64% ( 32 of 50)
58
Total Points Won
28
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61% ( 54 of 88)
1st Serve %
47% ( 28 of 59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72% ( 39 of 54)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
41% ( 14 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
40% ( 35 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 26 of 59)
79
Total Points Won
68
L
6-1 7-6(6) H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66% ( 87 of 132)
1st Serve %
59% ( 71 of 121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71% ( 62 of 87)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 50 of 71)
58% ( 26 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 30 of 50)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
33% ( 44 of 132)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 41 of 121)
129
Total Points Won
124
W
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) H2H
QF
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68% ( 39 of 57)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 16 of 35)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 20 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
65
Total Points Won
45
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63% ( 38 of 60)
1st Serve %
53% ( 27 of 51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 23 of 51)
63
Total Points Won
48
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57% ( 57 of 100)
1st Serve %
58% ( 57 of 99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77% ( 44 of 57)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 43 of 57)
63% ( 27 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
29% ( 29 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 34 of 99)
105
Total Points Won
94
L
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69% ( 41 of 59)
1st Serve %
63% ( 33 of 52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
37% ( 22 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
61
Total Points Won
50
L
6-3 6-3 H2H

Ward Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Ward are available here and Zandschulp photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions