M. Ymer
To Win
B. V. D. Zandschulp
To Win
James Ward vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L L W L
Form
W L L L L W L W W LHead To Head: Ward 1 - 0 Zandschulp
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ward winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Ward and Zandschulp was at the cinch Championships - London, 12-06-2021, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with James Ward getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James Ward | 1 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: cinch Championships - London(12-06-2021)
James Ward
Botic Van De Zandschulp
6
2
4
6
7
6
| Ward | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (13-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 92 |
| 89 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 38 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 7 |
| 52% (402-374) | Career Total W/L | 61% (366-232) |
| $460,450 | Career Prize Money | $3,555,920 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lajal VS Lemaitre PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cassone VS Zhu PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ward VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 7-6(4) |
Stats 
James Ward
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Ward VS Zandschulp H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 14 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:9:1 | Average Match Time | 2:9:1 |
| 58% (51/88) | 1st Serve % | 58% (61/106) |
| 78% (40/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (47/61) |
| 49% (18/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (16/45) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 41% (43/106) | Return Points Win % | 34% (30/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
James Ward Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
James Ward
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Illya Marchenko
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
17
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
James Ward
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
James Ward
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
James Ward
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
James Ward
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
76%
(
22 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin King
Player
James Ward
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Jan Choinski
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
86 of
125)
1st Serve %
68%
(
93 of
137)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
61 of
93)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
42 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
61 of
137)
144
Total Points Won
118
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
73 of
121)
1st Serve %
50%
(
68 of
136)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
53 of
68)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
34 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
48 of
136)
135
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
72 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
2
Aces
15
8
Double Faults
11
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
61%
(
34 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
49 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
127)
133
Total Points Won
122
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
83 of
122)
1st Serve %
50%
(
63 of
125)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
125)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (402/374) | Win/Loss | 61% (366/232) |
| 51% (945/903) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (837/603) |
| 51% (8967/8742) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7220/6393) |
| 56% (219/173) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 51% (79/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (172/108) |
| 47% (58/65) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 43% (46/60) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (12/15) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 3489 | Aces Total | 2927 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1489 | Total Double Faults | 2179 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:36:12 |
| 590.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 392.05 |
| 59% (21630/36358) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24468/39778) |
| 72% (15633/21630) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17480/24468) |
| 50% (7321/14728) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7363/15313) |
| 38% (1147/2997) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1806/4199) |
| 36% (12911/35816) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16656/40973) |
| 39% (22/35) | Slam W/L | 60% (33/22) |
| 43% (9/12) | Masters W/L | 49% (26/27) |
| 48% (10/11) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 40% (48/71) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/66) |
| 54% (204/172) | Challenger W/L | 63% (74/43) |
| 60% (109/73) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 53% (385/733) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (338/543) |
| 33% (12/36) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (21/42) |
| 50% (130/259) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (103/187) |
| 50% (124/249) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/196) |
| 81% (402/324) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (345/306) |
| 19% (402/77) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (345/38) |
| 20% (374/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (251/59) |
Ward vs. Zandschulp Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
