James McCabe vs Kasidit Samrej Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L L L W LHead-2-Head: McCabe 1 - 0 Samrej
They have played 3 sets in total, with McCabe winning 2 and Samrej winning 1. The last match between McCabe and Samrej was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 29-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with James McCabe getting the victory 6-3 6-7(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James McCabe | 1 |
| Kasidit Samrej | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Guangzhou Challenger(29-04-2025)
James McCabe
Kasidit Samrej
6
3
6
7
6
3
| McCabe | Stats | Samrej |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (17-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 39% (9-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 183 | Ranking | 391 |
| 176 | Highest Rank | 382 |
| 21 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 58% (157-113) | Career Total W/L | 53% (118-103) |
| $234,855 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bublik VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
21 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lehecka VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
21 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
James McCabe
Player
Kasidit Samrej
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
20
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
62%
(
31 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 13 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:16:19 | Average Match Time | 2:16:19 |
| 49% (49/99) | 1st Serve % | 52% (48/93) |
| 78% (38/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (35/48) |
| 62% (31/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (24/45) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 37% (34/93) | Return Points Win % | 30% (30/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
James McCabe
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
George Loffhagen
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
12
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Chris Rodesch
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Harold Mayot
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thijs Boogaard
Player
James McCabe
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
3
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
James McCabe
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
James McCabe
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
James McCabe
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kasidit Samrej Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Castelnuovo
Player
Kasidit Samrej
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Jun Hao Luo
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
8
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Strombachs
Player
Kasidit Samrej
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Kasidit Samrej
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
14
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Kasidit Samrej
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
41%
(
36 of
87)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
41%
(
19 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Kasidit Samrej
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
20
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
62%
(
31 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (157/113) | Win/Loss | 53% (118/103) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (274/222) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2428/2255) |
| 62% (132/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (114/98) |
| 40% (12/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 50% (11/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 1210 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 773 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:29:38 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.28 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8120/13281) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (5850/8120) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2543/5161) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (487/1208) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4918/12886) |
| 17% (1/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 38% (6/10) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (76/67) | Challenger W/L | 42% (22/30) |
| 71% (73/30) | Futures W/L | 59% (94/66) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (113/208) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (32/63) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (19/58) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (124/104) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (124/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (97/14) |
McCabe vs. Samrej Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
