T. Schoolkate
To Win
J. McCabe
To Win
James McCabe vs Borna Gojo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W L LHead-2-Head: McCabe 1 - 0 Gojo
They have played 2 sets in total, with McCabe winning 2 and Gojo winning 0. The last match between McCabe and Gojo was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with James McCabe getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James McCabe | 1 |
| Borna Gojo | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
James McCabe
Borna Gojo
6
4
7
5
| McCabe | Stats | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| 51% (21-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (16-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 181 | Ranking | 217 |
| 176 | Highest Rank | 72 |
| 22 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 59% (161-114) | Career Total W/L | 59% (255-179) |
| $300,855 | Career Prize Money | $669,560 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
09 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
James McCabe
Player
Borna Gojo
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:16:0 | Average Match Time | 1:16:0 |
| 73% (41/56) | 1st Serve % | 64% (39/61) |
| 83% (34/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (29/39) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 38% (23/61) | Return Points Win % | 23% (13/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
McCabe vs Gojo Match Preview :
- Mc Cabe's recent second serve performance shows a win rate of 43.85%, while Gojo's is slightly higher at 45.19%.
- Mc Cabe has a slight edge in returning second serves, winning 46.82% of points, compared to Gojo's 45.86%.
- For returns on first serves, Mc Cabe and Gojo are almost evenly matched at 23.26% and 23.13%, respectively. Is this balance an important factor? Possibly.
- Under pressure, Mc Cabe has demonstrated the ability to save 59.37% of breakpoints, surpassing Gojo's 53.44%.
- Performance in the last year shows Mc Cabe has not won any matches, whereas Gojo boasts a 59.09% win rate in matches played.
- In terms of opponent quality faced, Gojo's opponents have an average rank of 207.84, but Mc Cabe's are unspecified. Could this affect the outcome? It certainly might.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Mc Cabe has historically struggled with a 0% win rate, while Gojo has secured wins in 39% of such situations.
- Regarding break point conversion rates, Mc Cabe converts 31.89% of opportunities whereas Gojo converts 29.75%, offering a tactical insight into pressure points.
Editorial Prediction (June 22, 2025, UTC):
When evaluating the upcoming matchup between Mc Cabe and Gojo, several key performance metrics warrant attention.
Although both players demonstrate similar capabilities in first serve returns, Gojo's marginally better second serve performance may provide a slight advantage in sustaining longer rallies and points.
Mc Cabe excels in saving breakpoints, an indication of resilience, yet Gojo's superior historical machine data—reflected in a higher win rate and stronger performance under pressure—positions him favorably in critical moments.
Nevertheless, Mc Cabe's struggles in deciding sets might be a concern if this match is closely contested. Meanwhile, Gojo has shown a better ability to close out such matches effectively.
Considering these factors, Gojo appears to be the likely winner for this upcoming tennis match.
McCabe vs Gojo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Alafia Ayeni
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
James McCabe
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
66%
(
107 of
162)
1st Serve %
76%
(
108 of
143)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
75 of
107)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
72 of
108)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
35%
(
57 of
162)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
49 of
143)
154
Total Points Won
151
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Borna Gojo
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
James McCabe
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
George Loffhagen
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
12
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Chris Rodesch
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Borna Gojo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Borna Gojo
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Borna Gojo
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Aidan Mchugh
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
16
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Lui Maxted
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Borna Gojo
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
88 of
133)
3
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
55 of
88)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Alessandro Battiston
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Borna Gojo
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (161/114) | Win/Loss | 59% (255/179) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (590/449) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5407/4886) |
| 62% (132/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (120/74) |
| 40% (12/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (62/51) |
| 33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (63/41) |
| 56% (15/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 43% (10/13) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.66 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 3296 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1411 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:37:22 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.69 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 62% (19312/30929) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (14245/19312) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5738/11617) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1066/2655) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 37% (11389/30479) |
| 40% (4/6) | Slam W/L | 58% (18/13) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60% (9/6) |
| 38% (6/10) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (23/24) |
| 53% (77/67) | Challenger W/L | 61% (150/96) |
| 71% (73/30) | Futures W/L | 59% (48/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (249/425) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (113/214) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (86/163) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (256/210) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (256/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (177/43) |
McCabe vs. Gojo Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
