J. K. Trotter
To Win
C. Hemery
To Win
James Kent Trotter vs Viktor Durasovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W W L
Form
L W L L W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Trotter 1 - 0 Durasovic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Trotter winning 2 and Durasovic winning 1. The last match between Trotter and Durasovic was at the Gwangju Challenger, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James Kent Trotter | 1 |
| Viktor Durasovic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(23-04-2025)
James Kent Trotter
Viktor Durasovic
6
7
6
4
6
3
| Trotter | Stats | Durasovic |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (16-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (20-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 200 | Ranking | 234 |
| 170 | Highest Rank | 234 |
| 25 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (106-73) | Career Total W/L | 54% (393-332) |
| $79,295 | Career Prize Money | $14,785 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muller VS Safiullin PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Fonseca PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
James Kent Trotter
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
9
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 14 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:26:7 | Average Match Time | 2:26:7 |
| 63% (65/104) | 1st Serve % | 59% (57/96) |
| 80% (52/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (39/57) |
| 51% (20/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (25/39) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/6) |
| 33% (32/96) | Return Points Win % | 31% (32/104) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Trotter vs Durasovic Match Preview :
Well, brace yourself, dear tennis enthusiasts, as we delve into the side-splitting battle of Trotter vs. Durasovic! Let's volley these stats around like a fluffy tennis ball at a Wimbledon final, and see which competitor will eventually serve up the grand win.
Ladies and gentlemen, Trotter boasts a 50.46% success rate of second serve points once they step onto the court. Not too shabby, right? Durasovic, perhaps with fewer snacks pre-game, slides in with a 45.27% success rate. But wait, Durasovic rebounds by reclaiming 45.08% from their opponents' second serves, leaving Trotter trailing at a slightly less impressive 41.55%. Yet, when it comes to first serve returns, Durasovic daintily dances ahead at 27.86%, whereas Trotter seems to have a coffee break mindset, trailing at 19.8%.
Under pressure, Trotter's transformation into a majestic swan is evident as they save 60.87% of breakpoints. Durasovic, not to be outdone, is close behind, saving 58.64%. It's like watching two skilled arthropods clinging to a precarious leaf in a strong breeze. A knock-down drag-out affair indeed!
Over the last year, Trotter emerged victorious in 62.5% of matches played, while our friend Durasovic holds a close match-winning percentage of 61.64%. Meanwhile, when the surface changes to grass, both players become inexplicably allergic, failing to secure a single win. Instead, each finds peace and prosperity on Hard surfaces, with Trotter claiming 65% success and Durasovic 63%. Talk about a hard-hitting fact!
In the theater of Challengers/ITF matches over $10K, Trotter pirouettes with a score of 67.27%. Durasovic, however, rents most of their tennis apartments at Futures/Satellites, earning a respectable 62.79%. Despite playing against higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 302.02), Trotter shines brighter than your granny’s Silverware.
If the match heads to a deciding set, keep your hats on because Trotter swoops in, winning 68% of these thrilling finales. Durasovic, admirably, secures a not-too-shabby 63% in all matches. That's the classic Meryl Streep vs. Robert De Niro acting standoff of tennis stats!
For the keen live bettors out there, break-point conversions are tantalizingly close. Trotter converts 27.18% of these golden opportunities, while Durasovic just edges it at 29.49%. You’ll be sweating bullets faster than a coach loaded with espresso shots!
So, after this laugh-filled marathon through the statistical jungle gym, if forced to predict the outcome based on these stats with the gravitas of an overenthusiastic sports commentator, my money's on Trotter's witty racquet for sheer skill and tenacity, as they seem to pull a rabbit out of a hat the moment it truly counts!
Trotter vs Durasovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
James Kent Trotter
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Colton Smith
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
16
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
James Kent Trotter
64%
(
81 of
126)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
15
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chris Rodesch
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Brandon Holt
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Viktor Durasovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Viktor Durasovic
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Viktor Durasovic
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
71 of
89)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Viktor Durasovic
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Max Houkes
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Viktor Durasovic
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
54 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
118)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Viktor Durasovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (106/73) | Win/Loss | 54% (393/332) |
| 55% (230/185) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (903/801) |
| 52% (2165/1971) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (8419/8050) |
| 59% (60/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (183/110) |
| 36% (4/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (117/128) |
| 64% (39/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (93/92) |
| 50% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1442 | Aces Total | 2849 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 517 | Total Double Faults | 1854 |
| 1:39:7 | Average Match Time | 1:25:26 |
| 389.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 492.54 |
| 59% (7109/11957) | 1st Serve % | 59% (26116/44530) |
| 76% (5438/7109) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (18336/26116) |
| 51% (2479/4848) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9363/18414) |
| 39% (366/950) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1618/4069) |
| 36% (4312/11945) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16840/44168) |
| 60% (3/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 34% (10/19) |
| 29% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 29% (5/12) |
| 61% (78/50) | Challenger W/L | 47% (137/153) |
| 61% (23/15) | Futures W/L | 62% (241/148) |
| 59% (104/177) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (386/713) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 53% (46/86) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (140/263) |
| 66% (39/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (128/242) |
| 90% (91/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (374/322) |
| 10% (91/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (374/51) |
| 27% (88/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (351/70) |
Trotter vs. Durasovic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
