James Kent Trotter vs Calvin Hemery Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L W L
Form
L W L L W W W W L LHead-To-Head: Trotter 1 - 0 Hemery
They have played 2 sets in total, with Trotter winning 2 and Hemery winning 0. The last match between Trotter and Hemery was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James Kent Trotter | 1 |
| Calvin Hemery | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
James Kent Trotter
Calvin Hemery
7
6
6
4
| Trotter | Stats | Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (17-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 51% (22-21) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 198 | Ranking | 178 |
| 170 | Highest Rank | 116 |
| 25 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (107-74) | Career Total W/L | 58% (411-296) |
| $120,795 | Career Prize Money | $236,675 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-4 |
Stats 
James Kent Trotter
Player
Calvin Hemery
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:43:0 | Average Match Time | 1:43:0 |
| 66% (43/65) | 1st Serve % | 78% (66/85) |
| 84% (36/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (39/66) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (11/19) |
| 25% (2/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 41% (35/85) | Return Points Win % | 28% (18/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Trotter vs Hemery Match Preview :
- Recently, Trotter has been more effective on second serves, winning 49.11% of such points compared to Hemery's 46.09%. Does this give Trotter a serving advantage? It appears likely.
- Hemery, however, edges out with stronger returns, capturing 45.89% of opponent's second serve points, while Trotter manages 42.35%.
- In matches where players return first serves, Hemery is marginally ahead, with 21.87% compared to Trotter's 20.79%.
- When under pressure, Trotter is more adept at saving breakpoints, succeeding in 60.09% of attempts compared to Hemery's 52.33%.
- Trotter has a slightly better match-winning percentage over the last year at 60.94% compared to Hemery's 56.16%.
- Surface-wise, Hemery excels on Clay with a 60% win rate, while Trotter performs best on Indoor Hard courts at 65%.
- Both players commonly compete in Challengers/ITF events, but Trotter has a better win rate there at 65.38% versus Hemery's 60%.
- Hemery's recent opponents average a rank of 260.9, slightly higher quality than Trotter's, who face opponents ranked 270.02.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Trotter seems to have an advantage, winning 73% of such situations compared to Hemery's 65%.
- On breakpoints, Trotter turns 28.44% into wins, whereas Hemery takes advantage 26.62% of the time.
Editorial Prediction (June 22, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head stats indicate an intriguing matchup poised between Hemery and Trotter. Trotter's edge on second serve points could signify an upper hand during crucial phases of the match.
Despite Hemery having a more robust return game, it's Trotter's knack for saving breakpoints that might tilt the scale. Trotter's dependable balance between defensive skills and serving prowess could serve as a potent mix in high-pressure scenarios.
Given Hemery's excellence on clay and a tendency to perform better with slightly better-ranked opponents, he remains a formidable contender, particularly if the court matches his strengths.
However, with Trotter's superior deciding set record and a slight overall performance edge over the past year, the prediction leans towards Trotter emerging as the likely victor in this upcoming clash.
Trotter vs Hemery Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
60%
(
89 of
149)
1st Serve %
70%
(
86 of
123)
16
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
63 of
86)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
17)
35%
(
52 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
42 of
123)
139
Total Points Won
133
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Calvin Hemery
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
James Kent Trotter
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Colton Smith
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
16
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
James Kent Trotter
64%
(
81 of
126)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
15
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chris Rodesch
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Calvin Hemery
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29
Total Points Won
16
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Calvin Hemery
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
51 of
108)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mika Brunold
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
3
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Kalin Ivanovski
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
79)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Calvin Hemery
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Calvin Hemery
42%
(
39 of
92)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (107/74) | Win/Loss | 58% (411/296) |
| 55% (233/187) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (923/701) |
| 52% (2194/2000) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8178/7394) |
| 59% (60/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (95/64) |
| 36% (4/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (218/143) |
| 64% (39/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (96/85) |
| 50% (4/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.47 |
| 1457 | Aces Total | 3605 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 526 | Total Double Faults | 2309 |
| 1:39:35 | Average Match Time | 1:20:57 |
| 388.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 512.78 |
| 60% (7238/12145) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25271/40869) |
| 76% (5537/7238) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18188/25271) |
| 51% (2508/4907) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7741/15598) |
| 38% (368/975) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1587/3950) |
| 36% (4399/12179) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15987/41349) |
| 57% (4/3) | Slam W/L | 33% (10/20) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 29% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (19/23) |
| 61% (78/50) | Challenger W/L | 55% (207/172) |
| 61% (23/15) | Futures W/L | 69% (173/79) |
| 59% (105/179) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (406/685) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 13% (1/8) |
| 54% (48/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (133/250) |
| 65% (39/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (119/218) |
| 90% (92/83) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (412/359) |
| 10% (92/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (412/52) |
| 27% (89/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (294/52) |
Trotter vs. Hemery Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
