L. Pavlovic
To Win
J. K. Trotter
To Win
James Kent Trotter vs Benjamin Hassan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W L W
Form
L W W L W W W L L LHead-2-Head: Trotter 0 - 1 Hassan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Trotter winning 0 and Hassan winning 2. The last match between Trotter and Hassan was at the French Open - Paris, 23-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Benjamin Hassan getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James Kent Trotter | 0 |
| Benjamin Hassan | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(23-05-2025)
Benjamin Hassan
James Kent Trotter
6
2
7
6
| Trotter | Stats | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (17-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (17-19) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 200 | Ranking | 196 |
| 170 | Highest Rank | 143 |
| 25 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 2 |
| 59% (107-73) | Career Total W/L | 59% (324-227) |
| $79,295 | Career Prize Money | $340,000 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
- / Q2 round
ODDS
Upcoming Match
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Svajda VS Neumayer PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bonding VS Kubler PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:41:0 | Average Match Time | 1:41:0 |
| 66% (57/86) | 1st Serve % | 47% (31/66) |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (24/31) |
| 52% (15/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (21/35) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 32% (21/66) | Return Points Win % | 41% (35/86) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Trotter vs Hassan Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Hassan has won 45.08% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Trotter has a better second serve win rate of 49.3%. Could this indicate a service advantage for Trotter? The statistics suggest it might.
- Return Game Stats: Hassan has excelled in returning, winning 48.57% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Trotter's 40.5%. Hassan is notably stronger in first serve returns as well, with 29.88% as opposed to Trotter's 20.62%. These stats indicate Hassan's edge in return games.
- Under Pressure: Trotter has a slight edge in saving breakpoints, with a 58.99% success rate versus Hassan’s 56.21%. This could be critical during high-pressure moments in the match.
- Performance Overview: Hassan has won 51.28% of their matches in the past year, whereas Trotter boasts a higher win percentage of 65.08%. This suggests Trotter’s overall superior form in matches.
- Best Surface: Hassan performs best on Clay (61% win rate), while Trotter excels on indoor hard courts (65%). Grass is a weaker surface for both, with Trotter having no wins from a single match.
- Player Level: On Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, Trotter has a significant win rate advantage, achieving 69.23% compared to Hassan's 50.82%.
- Opponent Quality: Trotter has competed against higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 190.51 versus Hassan's 254.36. Does this experience against tougher competition give Trotter an edge? It’s likely.
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match goes into a deciding set, Trotter is more reliable, winning 75% of deciding sets compared to Hassan’s 54%.
- Break Point Conversion: Hassan is more efficient at converting break points, achieving 44.17%, while Trotter has a lower rate at 32.05%. This could be crucial for momentum shifts during the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 23, 2025, UTC):
The analysis of recent performances and key statistics reveals a competitive matchup poised between Hassan and Trotter. Each player exhibits particular strengths that could sway the outcome of the match.
Trotter's recent form on second serves and overall match win rate suggests an advantage in areas of serve effectiveness and consistency. Their higher win percentage in Challengers/ITF tournaments indicates better current performance against stronger opponents.
Conversely, Hassan's notable strength in return games and breakpoint conversion rates poses a significant challenge for Trotter. This could lead to crucial game-defining points, especially under pressure.
Considering all factors—including Trotter's superior track record in deciding sets and broader player experience—Trotter appears to have a slight edge. Therefore, Trotter is predicted to be the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Trotter vs Hassan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Calvin Hemery
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
James Kent Trotter
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Colton Smith
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
16
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
James Kent Trotter
64%
(
81 of
126)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
15
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chris Rodesch
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Benjamin Hassan
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
11
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
6
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Pavel Kotov
40%
(
36 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Benjamin Hassan
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Damir Dzumhur
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (107/73) | Win/Loss | 59% (324/227) |
| 56% (232/185) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (736/573) |
| 52% (2178/1981) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6474/6001) |
| 59% (60/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (59/41) |
| 36% (4/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (197/124) |
| 64% (39/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (66/57) |
| 57% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1448 | Aces Total | 1919 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 519 | Total Double Faults | 1625 |
| 1:39:8 | Average Match Time | 1:24:26 |
| 388.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.58 |
| 59% (7152/12022) | 1st Serve % | 55% (19149/34601) |
| 77% (5474/7152) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (13197/19149) |
| 51% (2490/4870) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7793/15455) |
| 38% (368/958) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1448/3460) |
| 36% (4347/12030) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13779/34611) |
| 67% (4/2) | Slam W/L | 50% (6/6) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 68% (15/7) |
| 29% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (10/11) |
| 61% (78/50) | Challenger W/L | 54% (164/138) |
| 61% (23/15) | Futures W/L | 68% (125/60) |
| 59% (105/178) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (315/539) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 54% (47/87) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (91/171) |
| 66% (39/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (115/207) |
| 90% (92/83) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (302/260) |
| 10% (92/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (302/41) |
| 27% (88/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (249/62) |
Trotter vs. Hassan Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
