James Davis vs Jake Van Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Davis vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
James Davis vs Jake Van Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Davis has won 39.79% of points on his second serve, while Emburgh has won 45.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Davis, in recent form, has won 44.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 46.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.43% and 31.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Davis has saved 67.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 48.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Davis has won 46.34% of matches played (W/L 19/ 22), with Emburgh winning 54% (W/L 27/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Davis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 27/ 19), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 50/ 35), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Davis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.5% of matches (W/L 19/ 21), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Davis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Davis winning 2 and Emburgh winning 0. The last match between Davis and Emburgh was at the M25 Montreal, 13-03-2023, Q1 round, I.hard with James Davis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Davis and Emburgh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Davis winning 0 times and Emburgh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Davis winning 0, and Emburgh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Davis has played against opponents with an average rank of 80.12 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 106.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Davis has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Davis has converted 48.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 38.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Davis 1 - 0 Emburgh
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (52-45)
Career Total W/L
55% (72-60)
27% (3-8)
YTD W/L
20% (2-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | James Davis | Jake Van Emburgh |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (35/52) | 50% (24/48) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 54% (13/24) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 33% (8/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 56% (27/48) | 35% (18/52) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
James Davis
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | James Davis | Jake Van Emburgh |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 27% (3/8) | 20% (2/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 29% (7/17) | 19% (4/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (120/136) | 39% (81/128) |
Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 17% (1/5) | 50% (2/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.22 |
Aces Total | 52 | 22 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.16 |
DFs Total | 11 | 16 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 140.82 | 101.8 |
1st Serve % | 68% (281/411) | 63% (311/494) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (204/281) | 60% (187/311) |
2nd Serve W% | 42% (54/130) | 43% (78/183) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (9/18) | 39% (15/38) |
Return Pts W% | 33% (127/389) | 37% (207/564) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 30% (3/7) | 20% (2/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 20% (2/10) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (8/0) |
James Davis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Harry Wendelken
Player
James Davis
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lorenzo Vatteroni
Player
James Davis
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marcello Serafini
Player
James Davis
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
11
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Finn Bass
Player
James Davis
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Davis
Player
Liam Hignett
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H |
view more
Jake Van Emburgh Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Timothee Andriveau
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kyle Overmyer
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more