James Auckland vs Kaes Van\'t Hof Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Auckland vs Hof analysis and find out who is favored!
James Auckland vs Kaes Van\'t Hof Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Auckland has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hof has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Auckland, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hof has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Auckland has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hof has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Auckland has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hof winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Auckland has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 10/ 29). Hof has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Auckland has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hof has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Auckland has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hof has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Auckland has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hof has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Auckland 0 - 0 Hof
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | James Auckland | Kaes Van\'t Hof |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
James Auckland Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Kei Nishikori
Player
James Auckland
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Michael McClune
Player
James Auckland
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Auckland
Player
Jeff Gast
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Kaes Van\'t Hof Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available