Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jakub Paul vs Mick Veldheer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Veldheer analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Paul vs Mick Veldheer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 51.53% of points on his second serve, while Veldheer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 58.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Veldheer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 58.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Veldheer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 62.12% of matches played (W/L 41/ 25), with Veldheer winning 16.67% (W/L 1/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Veldheer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 128/ 112).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 38/ 20), where as Veldheer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paul winning 1 and Veldheer winning 2. The last match between Paul and Veldheer was at the M25 Biel, 30-03-2021, Q3, I.hard with Mick Veldheer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Veldheer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paul winning 0 times and Veldheer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 0, and Veldheer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.88 while Veldheer has played against players with an average rank of 279.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Veldheer has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 50.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Veldheer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paul 0 - 1 Veldheer
522
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
882
Rank
509
High
28
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
54% (173-145)
Career Total W/L
55% (229-191)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jakub Paul | Mick Veldheer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (46/61) | 67% (37/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (25/46) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (7/15) | 61% (11/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (20/55) | 48% (29/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 10-6 |
Stats 
Mick Veldheer
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jakub Paul | Mick Veldheer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (28/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (244/228) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 240.41 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1024/1533) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (633/1024) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (255/509) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (79/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (656/1526) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Mick Veldheer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Mick Veldheer
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Mick Veldheer
55%
(
70 of
128)
1st Serve %
55%
(
74 of
135)
13
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
12
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
60%
(
35 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
34%
(
44 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
53 of
135)
137
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(7) 6-3 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Mick Veldheer
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Mick Veldheer
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Mick Veldheer
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mick Veldheer
Player
Timofey Stepanov
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Mick Veldheer
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Mick Veldheer
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandr Bulitski
Player
Mick Veldheer
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Vs Veldheer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
