Jakub Paul vs Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Hasenkopf analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Paul vs Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 50.16% of points on his second serve, while Hasenkopf has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 58.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hasenkopf has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.13% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 59.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hasenkopf has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 42/ 24), with Hasenkopf winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 64/ 35), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Hasenkopf has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 13/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 38/ 18), where as Hasenkopf has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paul winning 2 and Hasenkopf winning 1. The last match between Paul and Hasenkopf was at the Egypt F8 (Sharm El Sheikh), 03-03-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Jakub Paul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Hasenkopf have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paul winning 1 times and Hasenkopf 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 0, and Hasenkopf 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.27 while Hasenkopf has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hasenkopf has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 52.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hasenkopf has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paul 1 - 0 Hasenkopf
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
509
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (173-143)
Career Total W/L
50% (19-19)
65% (13-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jakub Paul | Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 19 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jakub Paul | Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (27/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (223/197) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
Aces Total | 23 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:45 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 230.15 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (912/1364) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (562/912) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (231/452) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (75/145) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (593/1354) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (12/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Matthew William Donald
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Cina
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(5) 6-1 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 7-6(4) 11-9 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more