A. Muller
To Win
J. Mensik
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W W LForm
W L W W W L L W L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Mensik winning 1 and Machac winning 2. The last match between Mensik and Machac was at the Miami Open - Miami, 26-03-2025, Round: Fourth, Surface: Hard, with Jakub Mensik getting the victory w/o.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Jakub Mensik | 0 |
Tomas Machac | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Miami Open - Miami(26-03-2025)
Mensik | Stats | Machac |
---|---|---|
69% (22-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (16-9) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
19 | Ranking | 21 |
19 | Highest Rank | 20 |
19 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | R |
7 | Titles | 11 |
63% (138-80) | Career Total W/L | 66% (274-141) |
$2,707,960 | Career Prize Money | $3,233,215 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o | |||||
6-4 2-6 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Jakub Mensik
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
89)
2
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
9
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
13 | Games Won | 14 |
12 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
9 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
2:14:38 | Average Match Time | 2:14:38 |
47% (42/89) | 1st Serve % | 60% (49/82) |
69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (34/49) |
38% (18/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
40% (33/82) | Return Points Win % | 47% (42/89) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Welcome to the world of tennis stats where numbers tell a story worthy of any grand slam triumph or epic meltdown. Let's get our teeth into Mensik and Machac, two tennis maestros with enough statistical quirks to keep any analyst happily perplexed.
In an arena where second services can make the difference between being a hero or a zero, Mensik clocks in with a second-serve success rate of 47.4%. Meanwhile, Machac is a smidgeon ahead at 48.83%. Second-serve prowess is like having the prowess of a ninja on speed dial, predicting the future one point at a time.
When it comes to the art of returning serves, Mensik and Machac dance a delicate tango while outsmarting their opponent's seconds. Mensik bossed 45.95% off his foe's second serves, with Machac closely pirouetting at 45.41%. First serves were a different tune, with Mensik at 22.81% and Machac at 21.82%. These return stats are like a crystal ball with a knack for predictions.
Under the pressure cooker that is tennis, breakpoints are where legends are born. Mensik, the magician, saves trouble 57.79% of the time, while Machac handles pressure with 54.34% skill. Betting big on Mensik when breakpoints are on the line could be a banker!
Looking at their romantic history with wins and losses, Mensik has waltzed through 60.66% of matches in the last year, Machac slightly outdanced him with 62.3%. They've crossed rackets once before, and Machac sashayed away with a win.
Surface matters, and these dance floors are no exception. Mensik loves a hard court with a sparkling 71% win rate, while Machac tap-dances his way through hard courts with a 69% success rate. Grass courts? Let’s just say Mensik prefers to practice his gardening elsewhere.
On the main tour's bustling dance floor, Mensik twirls with a 59.26% win rate, while Machac practically pirouettes at 68.97%. Ah, the sweet smell of freshly won points, and the occasional whiff of defeat!
Their direct tango in a head-to-head saw Machac taking the victory cake. Their average match resembles a marathon rather than a sprint, clocking in at a respectable 2 hours and 14 minutes. In deciding sets, Mensik struggles at 57% for all, while Machac clutches victory at a staggering 67%.
As the stats sing us toward the final judgement, Machac appears to hold more cards. So, with the statistical winds in Machac's favor, it seems he's the likely champ ready to twirl away with the victory bouquet. Let the best player wield their racket of destiny!
Mensik vs Machac Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jakub Mensik
65%
(
85 of
130)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
19
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
54 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
43 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
34 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Fabian Marozsan
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jakub Mensik
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
7
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
50 of
62)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Alexander Bublik
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Ben Shelton
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
8
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Tomas Machac
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Tommy Paul
Player
Tomas Machac
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tomas Machac
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Machac
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Sebastian Baez
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63% (138/80) | Win/Loss | 66% (274/141) |
61% (322/209) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (623/348) |
53% (2688/2421) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5029/4117) |
71% (70/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (83/37) |
59% (46/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (79/47) |
57% (20/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (106/51) |
29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
0.69 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
1722 | Aces Total | 1779 |
0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
774 | Total Double Faults | 800 |
1:45:56 | Average Match Time | 1:36:8 |
285.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.4 |
59% (9436/16054) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17250/27892) |
75% (7036/9436) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (12217/17221) |
49% (3217/6622) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5760/10668) |
41% (608/1466) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1260/2909) |
38% (6188/16080) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11579/28803) |
72% (13/5) | Slam W/L | 66% (31/16) |
67% (22/11) | Masters W/L | 55% (18/15) |
75% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 73% (8/3) |
54% (21/18) | Main Tour W/L | 64% (45/25) |
56% (36/28) | Challenger W/L | 67% (116/56) |
72% (42/16) | Futures W/L | 69% (54/24) |
66% (131/200) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (257/369) |
47% (7/15) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (14/28) |
57% (58/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (89/150) |
54% (39/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (63/118) |
85% (143/122) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (277/242) |
15% (143/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (277/29) |
21% (75/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (137/31) |