search

Jakub Mensik vs Antoine Hoang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mensik vs Hoang analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Jakub Mensik vs Antoine Hoang Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mensik has won 51.94% of points on his second serve, while Hoang has won 50.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mensik, in recent form, has won 49.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hoang has won 53.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.48% and 31.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Mensik has saved 68.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoang has saved 59.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Mensik has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 44/ 24), with Hoang winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 35/ 25). Hoang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 139/ 95), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 63/ 50).
  • Player level: In the last year, Mensik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 26/ 18), where as Hoang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mensik winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mensik winning 3 and Hoang winning 2. The last match between Mensik and Hoang was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 12-02-2023, Q1 round, I.hard with Jakub Mensik getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:17.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Mensik and Hoang have played a deciding set 2 times, with Mensik winning 1 times and Hoang 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mensik winning 0, and Hoang 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mensik has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.5 while Hoang has played against players with an average rank of 181.13.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mensik has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoang has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Mensik has converted 40.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoang has converted 43.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Mensik 1 - 1 Hoang

Jakub Mensik

6

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

5

Minor

74

Rank

69

High

18

Age

Plays

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

502

Rank

98

High

28

Age

R

Plays

Antoine Hoang

7

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

6

Minor

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

W W W L W L W L W L

Form

L W W W W L L W L W

65% (93-50)

Career Total W/L

58% (382-272)

72% (18-7)

YTD W/L

69% (18-8)

$593,365

Career Prize Money

$522,575

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Mensik VS Hoang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Jakub Mensik Antoine Hoang
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 3 2
Games Won 20 21
Aces (Total) 12 4
DFs (Total) 7 5
Avg Match Time 1:38:17 1:38:17
1st Serve % 62% (94/152) 78% (86/110)
1st Serve Win% 67% (63/94) 77% (66/86)
2nd Serve Win% 47% (27/58) 42% (10/24)
BPs Won% (Total) 40% (4/10) 36% (4/11)
Return Points W% 31% (34/110) 41% (62/152)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (1/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)

Mensik VS Hoang H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 3-6 7-5
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Antoine Hoang
65% ( 70 of 108)
1st Serve %
77% ( 68 of 88)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69% ( 48 of 70)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 48 of 68)
45% ( 17 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
40% ( 43 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 32 of 88)
97
Total Points Won
99
6-3 0-1 ret.
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Jakub Mensik
82% ( 18 of 22)
1st Serve %
55% ( 24 of 44)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
100% ( 18 of 18)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 15 of 24)
50% ( 2 of 4)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
9% ( 2 of 22)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 19 of 44)
39
Total Points Won
27

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Jakub Mensik Antoine Hoang
YTD W/L 72% (18/7) 69% (18/8)
Sets Win/Loss 68% (40/19) 68% (40/19)
Games Win/Loss 53% (314/278) 55% (309/253)
Hard Win/Loss 71% (17/7) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 100% (1/0) 69% (18/8)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.76 0.39
Aces Total 220 108
DFs per game 0.25 0.32
DFs Total 72 88
Avg Match Time 1:45:22 1:47:27
Avg Opp Rank 190.92 173.96
1st Serve % 60% (1132/1889) 69% (1219/1757)
1st Serve W% 75% (849/1132) 72% (876/1219)
2nd Serve W% 53% (403/757) 51% (275/538)
BPs Won% Total 43% (54/126) 43% (74/174)
Return Pts W% 35% (630/1793) 40% (721/1820)
Slam W/L 80% (4/1) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 50% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 100% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 71% (5/2) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 75% (6/2) 0% (0/1)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 72% (18/7)
Best of 3 Sets W% 74% (17/23) 69% (18/26)
Best of 5 Sets W% 50% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 69% (9/13) 78% (7/9)
Deciding Set W% 67% (4/6) 43% (3/7)
1st set W, W 89% (19/17) 89% (19/17)
1st set W, L 11% (19/2) 11% (19/2)
1st set L, W 17% (6/1) 14% (7/1)

Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Lukas Klein
Player
Jakub Mensik
73% ( 51 of 70)
1st Serve %
57% ( 47 of 82)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
84% ( 43 of 51)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 32 of 47)
58% ( 11 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 20 of 35)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
23% ( 16 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 30 of 82)
84
Total Points Won
68
L
7-6(6) 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Luca Nardi
57% ( 29 of 51)
1st Serve %
79% ( 37 of 47)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86% ( 25 of 29)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 25 of 37)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
25% ( 13 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 19 of 47)
57
Total Points Won
41
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Ben Shelton
Player
Jakub Mensik
67% ( 56 of 83)
1st Serve %
55% ( 50 of 91)
8
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
82% ( 46 of 56)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 37 of 50)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 19 of 41)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
29% ( 24 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 35 of 91)
94
Total Points Won
80
L
4-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48% ( 29 of 60)
1st Serve %
45% ( 24 of 53)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83% ( 24 of 29)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 16 of 24)
48% ( 15 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
35% ( 21 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 53)
62
Total Points Won
51
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jakub Mensik
71% ( 30 of 42)
1st Serve %
66% ( 40 of 61)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
77% ( 23 of 30)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 25 of 40)
67% ( 8 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
20% ( 1 of 5)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
26% ( 11 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 26 of 61)
57
Total Points Won
46
L
7-6(7) 1-0 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Borna Coric
61% ( 66 of 109)
1st Serve %
59% ( 66 of 111)
18
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
74% ( 49 of 66)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 50 of 66)
47% ( 20 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 19 of 45)
14% ( 2 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
37% ( 40 of 109)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 42 of 111)
111
Total Points Won
109
W
4-6 6-3 7-6(7) H2H
F
cross
Karen Khachanov
Player
Jakub Mensik
73% ( 52 of 71)
1st Serve %
73% ( 55 of 75)
9
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
3
83% ( 43 of 52)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 41 of 55)
68% ( 13 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
65% ( 13 of 20)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
21% ( 15 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
28% ( 21 of 75)
77
Total Points Won
69
L
7-6(12) 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Gael Monfils
72% ( 60 of 83)
1st Serve %
60% ( 45 of 75)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
63% ( 38 of 60)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 32 of 45)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 15 of 30)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
40% ( 33 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 28 of 75)
78
Total Points Won
80
W
6-4 1-6 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Andrey Rublev
66% ( 52 of 79)
1st Serve %
67% ( 45 of 67)
10
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81% ( 42 of 52)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 36 of 45)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 12 of 22)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
30% ( 24 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
28% ( 19 of 67)
74
Total Points Won
72
W
6-4 7-6(6) H2H
R2
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Andy Murray
62% ( 77 of 125)
1st Serve %
64% ( 78 of 121)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
68% ( 52 of 77)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 54 of 78)
58% ( 28 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 25 of 43)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
36% ( 45 of 125)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 42 of 121)
122
Total Points Won
124
W
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-6(4) H2H

Antoine Hoang Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Nicolas Ifi
68% ( 42 of 62)
1st Serve %
62% ( 48 of 77)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 34 of 48)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
32% ( 20 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 32 of 77)
74
Total Points Won
65
W
6-3 7-6(5) H2H
R2
cross
Axel Garcian
Player
Antoine Hoang
61% ( 48 of 79)
1st Serve %
71% ( 72 of 102)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
73% ( 35 of 48)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 47 of 72)
61% ( 19 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
32% ( 25 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 43 of 102)
97
Total Points Won
84
L
6-4 4-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
67% ( 62 of 92)
1st Serve %
60% ( 61 of 102)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
76% ( 47 of 62)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 41 of 61)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 20 of 41)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
30% ( 28 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 41 of 102)
105
Total Points Won
89
W
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Antoine Hoang
69% ( 29 of 42)
1st Serve %
59% ( 32 of 54)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
83% ( 24 of 29)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 20 of 32)
69% ( 9 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 6 of 22)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
21% ( 9 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 28 of 54)
61
Total Points Won
35
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
F
cross
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Antoine Hoang
67% ( 43 of 64)
1st Serve %
74% ( 42 of 57)
12
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
84% ( 36 of 43)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 25 of 42)
38% ( 8 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 7 of 15)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
31% ( 20 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 25 of 57)
69
Total Points Won
52
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Daniil Glinka
73% ( 55 of 75)
1st Serve %
60% ( 42 of 70)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
75% ( 41 of 55)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 32 of 42)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 13 of 28)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 24 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 25 of 70)
76
Total Points Won
69
W
7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Mika Brunold
70% ( 35 of 50)
1st Serve %
57% ( 29 of 51)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
74% ( 26 of 35)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 19 of 29)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 8 of 22)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
28% ( 14 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 24 of 51)
60
Total Points Won
41
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Mischa Lanz
78% ( 58 of 74)
1st Serve %
55% ( 36 of 65)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71% ( 41 of 58)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
50% ( 8 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 15 of 29)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
34% ( 25 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 65)
76
Total Points Won
63
W
7-6(7) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Antoine Hoang
Player
Tymur Bieldiugin
65% ( 39 of 60)
1st Serve %
63% ( 45 of 72)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
72% ( 28 of 39)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
35% ( 21 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 37 of 72)
76
Total Points Won
56
W
7-6(4) 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Antoine Hoang
56% ( 27 of 48)
1st Serve %
65% ( 33 of 51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
74% ( 20 of 27)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 17 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 26 of 51)
57
Total Points Won
42
L
6-1 6-3 H2H

Mensik Vs Hoang Prediction H2H Images To Share

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Antoine Hoang

M15 Azay-le-Rideau

Hoang vs Brosset H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Hoang vs Sabas H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Hoang vs Lagarrigue H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Hoang vs Bouquier H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Hoang vs Durand H2H Prediction , could play in The Quarterfinals

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions