Jake Eames vs Harris Trismen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eames vs Trismen analysis and find out who is favored!
Jake Eames vs Harris Trismen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eames has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Trismen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eames, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Trismen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eames has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trismen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eames has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Trismen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eames has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 30/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Trismen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eames has played against opponents with an average rank of while Trismen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eames has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trismen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eames has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trismen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Eames 0 - 0 Trismen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
695
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
44% (45-58)
Career Total W/L
33% (7-14)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jake Eames | Harris Trismen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jake Eames Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jose Statham
Player
Jake Eames
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Scott Puodziunas
Player
Jake Eames
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jake Eames
Player
Blake Ellis
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Harris Trismen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Filip Bergevi
Player
Harris Trismen
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Riaan Du Toit
Player
Harris Trismen
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Charles Force
Player
Harris Trismen
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
75 of
133)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
9
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
53 of
75)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
133)
117
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more