Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaimee Fourlis vs Rebeka Masarova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fourlis vs Masarova analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaimee Fourlis vs Rebeka Masarova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 41.98% of points on his second serve, while Masarova has won 41.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 53.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Masarova has won 50.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.15% and 37.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 46.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Masarova has saved 59.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 51.22% of matches played (W/L 21/ 20), with Masarova winning 50.88% (W/L 29/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76). Masarova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 125/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13), where as Masarova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 12/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fourlis winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 1 and Masarova winning 2. The last match between Fourlis and Masarova was at the Palermo Ladies Open - Palermo, 17-07-2022, Q3, Clay with Rebeka Masarova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fourlis and Masarova have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fourlis winning 0 times and Masarova 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fourlis winning 0, and Masarova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.24 while Masarova has played against players with an average rank of 143.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Masarova has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 51.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Masarova has converted 42.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fourlis 0 - 1 Masarova
242
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
89
Rank
62
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (203-152)
Career Total W/L
65% (217-119)
46% (6-7)
YTD W/L
46% (11-13)
$275,258
Career Prize Money
$785,190
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Rebeka Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (58/77) | 70% (64/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (43/58) | 80% (51/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 44% (12/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (28/91) | 31% (24/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
75%
(
58 of
77)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Rebeka Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (6/7) | 46% (11/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (13/18) | 49% (30/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (138/149) | 51% (286/280) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 43% (6/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 35 | 124 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:13 | 1:50:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 204.23 | 155.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (580/899) | 62% (1194/1940) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (329/580) | 66% (787/1194) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (136/319) | 41% (303/746) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (59/102) | 43% (90/211) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (437/957) | 43% (745/1742) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 64% (7/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (6/13) | 46% (11/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 38% (5/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 25% (12/3) |
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sara Lanca
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Deborah Chiesa
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
59%
(
49 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
68 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Yana Morderger
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
52 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Ayano Shimizu
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rebeka Masarova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Rebeka Masarova
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Rebeka Masarova
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
0
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Rebeka Masarova
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Naiktha Bains
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Rebeka Masarova
79%
(
63 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
42%
(
42 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
45%
(
26 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Fiona Ferro
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Rebeka Masarova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fourlis Vs Masarova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
