Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaimee Fourlis vs Magdalena Pantuckova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fourlis vs Pantuckova analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaimee Fourlis vs Magdalena Pantuckova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 42.16% of points on his second serve, while Pantuckova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 54.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pantuckova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.29% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 47.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pantuckova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 52.5% of matches played (W/L 21/ 19), with Pantuckova winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76). Pantuckova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 18/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 15/ 12), where as Pantuckova has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.63 while Pantuckova has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pantuckova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 51.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pantuckova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fourlis 0 - 0 Pantuckova
242
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
424
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
57% (203-151)
Career Total W/L
60% (185-125)
50% (6-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$275,258
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fourlis VS Pantuckova H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Magdalena Pantuckova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (13/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (137/140) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 203.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (566/871) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (325/566) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (131/305) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (59/102) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (430/930) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sara Lanca
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Deborah Chiesa
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
59%
(
49 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
68 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Yana Morderger
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
52 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Ayano Shimizu
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Magdalena Pantuckova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Magdalena Pantuckova
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Pantuckova
Player
Valentyna Ivakhnenko
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenka Munzarova
Player
Magdalena Pantuckova
45%
(
25 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Magdalena Pantuckova
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
1
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Magdalena Pantuckova
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Magdalena Pantuckova
Player
Johana Markova
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalena Pantuckova
Player
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
52%
(
27 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magdalena Pantuckova
Player
Diana Demidova
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fourlis Vs Pantuckova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
