Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaimee Fourlis vs Jesika Maleckova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fourlis vs Maleckova analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaimee Fourlis vs Jesika Maleckova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 42.3% of points on his second serve, while Maleckova has won 47.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 53.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Maleckova has won 56.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.51% and 37.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 48.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maleckova has saved 44.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 47.22% of matches played (W/L 17/ 19), with Maleckova winning 57.5% (W/L 23/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76). Maleckova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12), where as Maleckova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.53% of matches (W/L 23/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fourlis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 2 and Maleckova winning 0. The last match between Fourlis and Maleckova was at the TEB BNP Paribas Tennis Championship - Istanbul, 17-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Jaimee Fourlis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fourlis and Maleckova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fourlis winning 0 times and Maleckova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fourlis winning 0, and Maleckova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.36 while Maleckova has played against players with an average rank of 254.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 79% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maleckova has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 48.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maleckova has converted 58.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fourlis 1 - 0 Maleckova
257
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
440
Rank
191
High
29
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (199-150)
Career Total W/L
59% (337-233)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$275,258
Career Prize Money
$11,343
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Jesika Maleckova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (42/60) | 58% (44/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (30/42) | 59% (26/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (9/18) | 44% (14/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (36/76) | 35% (21/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Jesika Maleckova
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Jesika Maleckova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 47% (7/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 29% (5/12) | 47% (15/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (74/96) | 51% (143/138) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:59 | 1:24:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 107.43 | 290.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (350/540) | 62% (510/826) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (202/350) | 64% (327/510) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (83/190) | 47% (149/316) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (25/45) | 56% (53/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (224/544) | 46% (399/876) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (2/7) | 47% (7/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Ayano Shimizu
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
74 of
119)
3
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
8
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
74)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
34 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
46 of
119)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaylah Mcphee
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Talia Gibson
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesika Maleckova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jesika Maleckova
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Aneta Kladivova
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Rebecca Peterson
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Liriza Selishta
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
48
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jesika Maleckova
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Victoria Borodulina
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Jesika Maleckova
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Alja Senica
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Jesika Maleckova
45%
(
25 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
19 of
44)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fourlis Vs Maleckova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
