Jacqueline Cabaj Awad vs Patricia Georgiana Goina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L L L L
Form
W W L L L W W W L LHead-to-head: Awad 0 - 1 Goina
They have played 2 sets in total, with Awad winning 0 and Goina winning 2. The last match between Awad and Goina was at the W15 Bucharest, 19-02-2025, First, I.hard with Patricia Georgiana Goina getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
W15 Bucharest(19-02-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Patricia Georgiana Goina
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
3
Games Won
12
1
Aces (Total)
1
3
Total Double Faults
4
1:3:32
Average Match Time
1:3:32
68% (34/50)
1st Serve %
59% (24/41)
50% (17/34)
1st Serve Win %
67% (16/24)
19% (3/16)
2nd Serve Win %
53% (9/17)
50% (2/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
60% (6/10)
39% (16/41)
Return Points Win %
60% (30/50)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad vs Patricia Georgiana Goina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jacqueline Cabaj Awad 0 - 1 Patricia Georgiana Goina
Recent Second Serve Performance:
Awad and Goina have been displaying their exceptional skills in recent months, with Awad securing victory in 43.28% of points on their second serve, slightly edging out Goina who has triumphed in 42.13%. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between the outcome of matches and these outstanding statistics.
Return Game Statistics:
Awad's mastery in return game cannot be overlooked, as evident from their ability to seize an impressive 60.21% of their opponent's second serve points in recent encounters. On the other hand, Goina has proven to be equally formidable, capturing 59.79% of these points. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Awad boasts a success rate of 42.98%, while Goina follows closely with 42.48%. These figures greatly influence the prediction of the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis:
One valuable statistic for accurate in-game betting predictions is the ability to save breakpoints. Awad has proved their mettle in this area, preserving 49.48% of breakpoints in recent times. In comparison, Goina has displayed commendable resilience with a saving rate of 41.67%.
Performance Overview:
Over the past year, Awad, with an impressive 56.9% win rate (W/L 33/25), has demonstrated their prowess, but Goina remains a force to be reckoned with, securing victory in 60% of their matches (W/L 21/14). These statistics provide us with an insightful overview of their head-to-head performance.
Preferred Surfaces:
Awad excels on I.hard surfaces, dominating with an impressive 63% win rate (W/L 54/32). Conversely, their performance on Clay surfaces suffers, with a win rate of only 45% (W/L 69/83). Meanwhile, Goina thrives on I.hard surfaces, conquering opponents with a win rate of 67% (W/L 2/1). However, their performance on Clay surfaces falls behind, with a win rate of 54% (W/L 20/17).
Player Level:
Awad has predominantly participated in the exclusive Challengers/ITF tournaments valued at over $10,000, boasting a respectable 48.57% win rate (W/L 17/18). In contrast, Goina has predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10,000 valuation, conquering opponents with a commendable 57.14% win rate (W/L 16/12). Therefore, when comparing player statistics to predict the favored contender, their performance must be meticulously assessed relative to the level of the event they have been participating in.
Opponent Quality Statistics:
Over the past 12 months, Awad has frequently encountered opponents with an average ranking of 394.52. Meanwhile, Goina has faced fierce competitors with an average ranking of 243.49, demonstrating their capability to compete against higher-ranked players.
Deciding Set Performance:
For those who eagerly engage in live predictions and riveting betting experiences, the outcome of a match's deciding set is of utmost importance. Awad has managed to triumph in 28% of deciding sets played in the last year. In comparison, Goina has showcased remarkable resilience, prevailing in 43% of matches on the tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics:
Past player performance serves as a valuable tool in predicting the outcome of tennis matches. However, as events progress, attention should be devoted to evaluating current event statistics to identify players in exceptional form. Make sure to explore the section below for up-to-date information on their performances in the ongoing event. Additionally, some players may exhibit heightened performance levels specific to certain events, which must be considered when determining the anticipated outcome.
Break Point Conversion:
In recent times, Awad has impressively converted 53.57% of their breakpoint opportunities, enhancing their chances of success. Meanwhile, Goina has demonstrated a conversion rate of 41.67% when seizing the chance to break their opponent's serve. These statistics are pivotal in offering valuable insights for timely in-game betting tips.
If you have an inclination towards models that predict the outcome of tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. However, be advised that the material within may be more suited for those with a penchant for statistical analysis.
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Georgiana Goina
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kira Pavlova
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
87%
(
93 of
107)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
19
47%
(
44 of
93)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
53%
(
57 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
54 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
14
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Melis Sezer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Noemi Maines
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Valeria Monko
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zoziya Kardava
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
0
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
9
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
22%
(
6 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patricia Georgiana Goina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oana Georgeta Simion
Player
Patricia Georgiana Goina
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katarina Stresnakova
Player
Patricia Georgiana Goina
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Georgiana Goina
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patricia Georgiana Goina
Player
Federica Sacco
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Patricia Georgiana Goina
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Georgiana Goina
Player
Luna Ivkovic
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patricia Georgiana Goina
Player
Unknown Player
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
83%
(
55 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (337/262)
Win/Loss
53% (23/20)
56% (772/611)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (51/43)
53% (6561/5897)
Games Win/Loss
51% (433/408)
59% (197/136)
Hard Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
45% (69/83)
Clay Win/Loss
54% (20/17)
62% (71/43)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (3/3)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.14
Aces Per Game
0.06
838
Aces Total
24
0.39
Double Faults Per Game
0.18
2397
Total Double Faults
73
1:18:8
Average Match Time
1st Match
545.9
Average Opponent Rank
257.98
65% (20368/31329)
1st Serve %
57% (693/1220)
62% (12670/20368)
1st Serve Win %
62% (430/693)
41% (4531/10961)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (229/527)
48% (2109/4366)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (79/179)
47% (15125/31860)
Return Points Win %
46% (603/1321)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
11% (1/8)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
47% (114/128)
Challenger W/L
56% (5/4)
65% (222/122)
Futures W/L
53% (18/16)
56% (333/593)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
53% (23/43)
0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
57% (60/106)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
60% (3/5)
47% (87/187)
Deciding Set Win %
38% (3/8)
85% (333/283)
1st Set Won, Won Match
92% (24/22)
15% (333/50)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
8% (24/2)
20% (266/53)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
5% (19/1)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
