Jacob Fearnley vs Ken Cavrak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fearnley vs Cavrak analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacob Fearnley vs Ken Cavrak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fearnley has won 51.77% of points on his second serve, while Cavrak has won 57.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fearnley, in recent form, has won 61.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cavrak has won 48.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.09% and 25.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fearnley has saved 68.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cavrak has saved 63.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fearnley has won 85.71% of matches played (W/L 24/ 4), with Cavrak winning 69.23% (W/L 9/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fearnley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 86% (W/L 25/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Cavrak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 19/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Fearnley has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 24/ 4), where as Cavrak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.23% of matches (W/L 9/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fearnley has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.07 while Cavrak has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fearnley has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cavrak has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fearnley has converted 48.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cavrak has converted 52.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fearnley 0 - 0 Cavrak
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
511
Rank
506
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
893
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
78% (35-10)
Career Total W/L
49% (33-34)
100% (8-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jacob Fearnley | Ken Cavrak |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 100% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 94% (16/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 67% (101/50) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.57 | 0 |
Aces Total | 42 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.49 | 0 |
DFs Total | 36 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:21:22 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 309 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (271/451) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 78% (212/271) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (94/180) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (36/76) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 49% (246/506) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 100% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Federico Iannaccone
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Jonas Forejtek
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Yanki Erel
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Kylian Collignon
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tim Handel
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Alexey Vatutin
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
13
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijmen Loof
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
8
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Fearnley
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
Ken Cavrak Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Ken Cavrak
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
15
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ken Cavrak
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Ken Cavrak
Player
Daniel Litvinov
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-6(5) 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Andrea Fiorentini
Player
Ken Cavrak
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ken Cavrak
Player
Runyu Zhao
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 3-6 10-8 | H2H |
view more