Jacob Bradshaw vs Pierre Antoine Faut Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W L L L
Form
L W W L L W W L L LHead-to-head: Bradshaw 0 - 1 Faut
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bradshaw winning 0 and Faut winning 2. The last match between Bradshaw and Faut was at the M15 Lannion, 19-02-2025, First, I.hard with Pierre Antoine Faut getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
M15 Lannion(19-02-2025)
6
3
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Pierre Antoine Faut
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
97%
(
29 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
7
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
2
4
Total Double Faults
4
1:39:47
Average Match Time
1:39:47
59% (42/71)
1st Serve %
51% (30/59)
76% (32/42)
1st Serve Win %
97% (29/30)
38% (11/29)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (14/29)
0% (0/1)
Break Points Won % (Total)
17% (2/12)
27% (16/59)
Return Points Win %
39% (28/71)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jacob Bradshaw vs Pierre Antoine Faut Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jacob Bradshaw 0 - 1 Pierre Antoine Faut
Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Bradshaw has demonstrated outstanding proficiency on their second serve, winning an impressive 56.1% of points. Meanwhile, Faut's performance in this aspect falls slightly behind at 41.58%. It is crucial to note that this particular statistic holds a significant correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Return Game Statistics: Analyzing the return game, recent data reveals that Bradshaw has triumphed in 47.26% of their opponent's second serve points. Faut, on the other hand, boasts a marginally lower success rate of 47.25%. When considering first serve returns, Bradshaw has achieved a respectable 28.57%, whereas Faut has attained 40.99%. These figures prove highly influential in determining the favored contender in this head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: When it comes to saving breakpoints in critical moments, Bradshaw has exhibited remarkable resilience, rescuing an impressive 58.99% of such instances in recent form. Conversely, Faut has managed to save 45.16% of breakpoints. This statistic is undeniably valuable for in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Examining the past year, Bradshaw has emerged victorious in 57.38% of their matches (with a win-loss record of 35/26). Faut, on the other hand, has achieved a 50% success rate (with a win-loss record of 2/2). By formulating an overall head-to-head prediction overview with these figures, one gains insightful foresight.
Surface Specialization: Bradshaw's expertise lies in their exceptional win rate of 60% on the Hard surface (win-loss record of 124/84). However, their performance significantly deteriorates on Indoor Hard, where they have failed to secure a single victory out of their sole match played in this context. Conversely, Faut flourishes on Indoor Hard with a 50% success rate (win-loss record of 2/2), while struggling on Clay, failing to claim any victories out of their two matches (win-loss record of 0/2).
Player Level: During the past year, Bradshaw has been predominantly competing in the highly competitive Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K. Within this framework, they have remarkably achieved a 60.42% win rate (win-loss record of 29/19). In contrast, Faut's participation has been focused on the same category of tournaments, where they have secured a 50% win rate (win-loss record of 2/2). It is crucial to consider the context of these statistics when predicting the favorite, as it is relative to the level of competition they have faced.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Bradshaw has predominantly faced opponents with an average ranking of 432.21. In contrast, Faut's adversaries have boasted a slightly higher average ranking of 442. These numbers provide insight into the caliber of opponents each player has encountered.
Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, in the scenario where this match enters a deciding set, Bradshaw's track record suggests that they have triumphed in 54% of deciding sets over the past year. In comparison, Faut boasts a perfect record, winning 100% of their deciding sets in all matches played on the tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance serves as a valuable indicator for predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics for a player's up-to-date form. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of an in-form player's capabilities, one should refer to the section below (if the player has competed thus far in the current event). Furthermore, certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, necessitating the incorporation of these nuances when forecasting the potential outcome.
Break Point Conversion: Recent records unveil Bradshaw's excellence in converting breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on 36.23% of these moments. Conversely, Faut has displayed an even higher level of effectiveness, successfully converting 54.17% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic serves as a compelling indicator for in-game, live betting tips whenever either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
If you have an inclination towards models that predict tennis matches, this article represents an ideal starting point. However, be warned, for this resource specifically caters to the desires of stats aficionados.
Jacob Bradshaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Faut
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
97%
(
29 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
James Watt
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
70 of
97)
3
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Cruz Hewitt
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Quentin Halys
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
50
Total Points Won
46
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
72%
(
21 of
29)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
5 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Pierre Antoine Faut Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Pierre Antoine Faut
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Pierre Antoine Faut
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Pierre Antoine Faut
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Faut
Player
Robin Catry
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Faut
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
97%
(
29 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Pierre Antoine Faut
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mae Malige
Player
Pierre Antoine Faut
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Faut
Player
Tom Gentzsch
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
38%
(
16 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
56%
(
44 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Faut
Player
Charlie Camus
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (128/92)
Win/Loss
36% (4/7)
57% (281/209)
Sets Win/Loss
38% (9/15)
53% (2478/2209)
Games Win/Loss
48% (117/125)
60% (124/84)
Hard Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
40% (4/6)
Clay Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)
Indoor Hard W/L
44% (4/5)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.31
Aces Per Game
0.1
712
Aces Total
12
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.31
397
Total Double Faults
36
1:23:1
Average Match Time
1:26:20
367.27
Average Opponent Rank
385.45
63% (7201/11394)
1st Serve %
59% (370/632)
69% (4964/7201)
1st Serve Win %
64% (238/370)
52% (2178/4193)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (115/262)
41% (413/1018)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (33/82)
38% (4372/11469)
Return Points Win %
42% (280/659)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
20% (1/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
44% (8/10)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/1)
60% (119/78)
Futures W/L
40% (4/6)
60% (125/210)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
36% (4/11)
33% (1/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
61% (42/69)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/3)
53% (29/55)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (1/2)
88% (127/112)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (4/4)
12% (127/15)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (4/0)
16% (92/15)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (7/0)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
