Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jacob Bradshaw vs Aman Sharma Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bradshaw vs Sharma analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacob Bradshaw vs Aman Sharma Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bradshaw has won 52.34% of points on his second serve, while Sharma has won 47.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bradshaw, in recent form, has won 50.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sharma has won 59.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.78% and 36.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bradshaw has saved 61.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sharma has saved 54.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bradshaw has won 52.7% of matches played (W/L 39/ 35), with Sharma winning 42.86% (W/L 3/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bradshaw has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 101/ 63), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sharma has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bradshaw has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 36/ 28), where as Sharma has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bradshaw winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bradshaw winning 2 and Sharma winning 0. The last match between Bradshaw and Sharma was at the M25 Monastir, 16-05-2022, Q3, Hard with Jacob Bradshaw getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bradshaw and Sharma have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bradshaw winning 0 times and Sharma 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bradshaw winning 0, and Sharma 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bradshaw has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.8 while Sharma has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bradshaw has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sharma has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bradshaw has converted 50.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sharma has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bradshaw 1 - 0 Sharma
556
Rank
554
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
60% (105-70)
Career Total W/L
46% (17-20)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
75% (3-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jacob Bradshaw | Aman Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (27/47) | 66% (45/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (21/27) | 58% (26/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 30% (7/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (35/68) | 32% (15/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Aman Sharma
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jacob Bradshaw | Aman Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 75% (3/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (29/22) | 67% (6/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (260/232) | 53% (47/42) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 106 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:49 | 1:12:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 188.17 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (947/1597) | 63% (111/176) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (653/947) | 60% (67/111) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (343/650) | 48% (31/65) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (66/130) | 40% (10/25) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (603/1529) | 47% (91/192) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (12/5) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Jacob Bradshaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Dussin
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(7) 7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Edas Butvilas
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Martin Klizan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Matthew William Donald
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioannis Xilas
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
98)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Mihai Alexandru Coman
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aman Sharma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Adit Sinha
Player
Aman Sharma
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aman Sharma
Player
Justin Roberts
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aman Sharma
Player
Evan Sharygin
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 2-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Aman Sharma
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
52
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Aman Sharma
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Bradshaw Vs Sharma Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
