Jack Gibbens vs Serafin Zund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibbens vs Zund analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Gibbens vs Serafin Zund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibbens has won 44.64% of points on his second serve, while Zund has won 42.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibbens, in recent form, has won 38.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zund has won 40.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 17.89% and 25.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibbens has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zund has saved 51.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibbens has won 20% of matches played (W/L 1/ 4), with Zund winning 48.78% (W/L 20/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibbens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 52/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Zund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 21/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibbens has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Zund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.78% of matches (W/L 20/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibbens winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Gibbens winning 1 and Zund winning 0. The last match between Gibbens and Zund was at the M15 Monastir, 06-12-2020, Q1 round, Hard with Jack Gibbens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibbens and Zund have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gibbens winning 0 times and Zund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibbens winning 0, and Zund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibbens has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.4 while Zund has played against players with an average rank of 19.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibbens has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zund has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibbens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zund has converted 35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gibbens 1 - 0 Zund
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
44% (71-90)
Career Total W/L
43% (30-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jack Gibbens | Serafin Zund |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
Games Won | 1 | 0 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-0 ret. |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jack Gibbens | Serafin Zund |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (31/36) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.09 |
DFs Total | 0 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (43/61) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (23/43) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/18) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 26% (12/46) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jack Gibbens Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Marcus Walters
Player
Jack Gibbens
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Beaven
Player
Jack Gibbens
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jack Gibbens
Player
Siim Troost
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
5
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
23 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-6(6) 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Jack Gibbens
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Johannes Ingildsen
Player
Jack Gibbens
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Eric Morris
Player
Jack Gibbens
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 5-7 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jack Gibbens
Player
Karlo Cubelic
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mark Lajal
Player
Jack Gibbens
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
14
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jack Gibbens
Player
Tadas Babelis
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 4-6 14-12 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Serafin Zund Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Florent Bax
Player
Serafin Zund
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mehdi Sadaoui
Player
Serafin Zund
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Serafin Zund
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(2) 6-1 10-1 | H2H |
view more