Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Gibbens vs Matthew Foster-Estwick Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibbens vs Foster-Estwick analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Gibbens vs Matthew Foster-Estwick Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibbens has won 35.48% of points on his second serve, while Foster-Estwick has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibbens, in recent form, has won 36.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Foster-Estwick has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 16.67% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibbens has saved 61.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Foster-Estwick has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibbens has won 20% of matches played (W/L 1/ 4), with Foster-Estwick winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibbens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 52/ 56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Foster-Estwick has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 23/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibbens has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Foster-Estwick has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibbens winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gibbens winning 2 and Foster-Estwick winning 0. The last match between Gibbens and Foster-Estwick was at the M15 Cancun, 13-08-2019, Q3, Hard with Jack Gibbens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibbens and Foster-Estwick have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gibbens winning 0 times and Foster-Estwick 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibbens winning 0, and Foster-Estwick 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibbens has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Foster-Estwick has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibbens has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Foster-Estwick has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibbens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Foster-Estwick has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gibbens 1 - 0 Foster-Estwick
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
44% (71-91)
Career Total W/L
44% (29-37)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gibbens VS Foster-Estwick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jack Gibbens | Matthew Foster-Estwick |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gibbens VS Foster-Estwick H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Gibbens | Matthew Foster-Estwick |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 38% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.5 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 82% (61/74) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (38/61) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (7/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 25% (17/67) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jack Gibbens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
George Houghton
Player
Jack Gibbens
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
82%
(
61 of
74)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Walters
Player
Jack Gibbens
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Beaven
Player
Jack Gibbens
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jack Gibbens
Player
Siim Troost
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
5
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
23 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-6(6) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Jack Gibbens
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johannes Ingildsen
Player
Jack Gibbens
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Morris
Player
Jack Gibbens
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 5-7 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jack Gibbens
Player
Karlo Cubelic
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Jack Gibbens
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
14
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Gibbens
Player
Tadas Babelis
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 4-6 14-12 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Foster-Estwick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Amaury Raynel
Player
Matthew Foster-Estwick
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Foster-Estwick
Player
Jesse Flores
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 5-7 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Matthew Foster-Estwick
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Gibbens Vs Foster-Estwick Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
