Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Draper vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Draper vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Draper vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Draper 1 - 0 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draper has won 51.54% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 46.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draper, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 51.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.13% and 33.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draper has saved 57.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 60.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draper has won 63.77% of matches played (W/L 44/ 25), with Zandschulp winning 52.78% (W/L 38/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 72/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 24/ 19). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 88/ 47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 24/ 9), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 12/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Draper winning 1 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Draper winning 3 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Draper and Zandschulp was at the U.S. Open - New York, 31-08-2024, Third, Hard with Jack Draper getting the victory 6-3 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draper and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Draper winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Draper winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draper has played against opponents with an average rank of 77.46 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 119.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draper has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draper has converted 39.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 40.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
20
Rank
20
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
67
Rank
22
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
68% (221-103)
Career Total W/L
62% (348-210)
60% (32-21)
YTD W/L
49% (28-29)
$2,673,085
Career Prize Money
$3,233,175
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jack Draper vs Botic Van De Zandschulp For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Draper VS Zandschulp
Draper VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jack Draper | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 0 |
| Games Won | 18 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 6 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:0 | 2:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (61/106) | 59% (41/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (47/61) | 71% (29/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (20/45) | 31% (9/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 10% (1/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (32/70) | 37% (39/106) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Draper VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
99
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Draper | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (32/21) | 49% (28/29) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (83/60) | 49% (67/70) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (748/648) | 50% (662/668) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 66% (19/10) | 45% (9/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 57% (16/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.63 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 432 | 248 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 169 | 215 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 49.55 | 123.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (2447/4178) | 63% (2652/4226) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (1908/2447) | 70% (1859/2652) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (883/1731) | 46% (731/1574) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (163/384) | 40% (167/420) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (1651/4397) | 39% (1678/4279) |
| Slam W/L | 64% (7/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Masters W/L | 46% (6/7) | 50% (6/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Main Tour W/L | 72% (18/7) | 42% (8/11) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (25/41) | 50% (24/48) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (11/22) | 42% (10/24) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (12/21) | 47% (8/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (30/25) | 89% (28/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (30/5) | 11% (28/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (23/7) | 10% (29/3) |
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Jack Draper
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
49
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
11
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Mattia Bellucci
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Jack Draper
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jack Draper
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Jack Draper
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
64 of
131)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
10
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
56 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Alex De Minaur
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Tomas Machac
47%
(
37 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
11
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
89
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
99
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
62%
(
83 of
133)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
59 of
75)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
37%
(
49 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
129
Total Points Won
128
|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Luca Nardi
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
68 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Raphael Collignon
91%
(
74 of
81)
1st Serve %
89%
(
68 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
99
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Carlos Alcaraz
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Draper Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Draper are available here and Zandschulp photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
