Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ivo Minar vs Michael Lammer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Minar vs Lammer analysis and find out who is favored!
Ivo Minar vs Michael Lammer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Minar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lammer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Minar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Minar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Minar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lammer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Minar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Lammer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 83/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Minar winning 3 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Minar winning 7 and Lammer winning 4. The last match between Minar and Lammer was at the Wimbledon - London, 14-06-2010, Q1 round, Grass with Ivo Minar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Minar and Lammer have played a deciding set 3 times, with Minar winning 2 times and Lammer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Minar winning 1, and Lammer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Minar has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lammer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Minar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Minar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Minar 3 - 1 Lammer
Ret.
Rank
62
High
39
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
150
High
42
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
55% (379-315)
Career Total W/L
55% (399-331)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$371,465
Career Prize Money
$153,020
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ivo Minar | Michael Lammer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 7 | 4 |
| Games Won | 60 | 50 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (69/121) | 66% (58/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (43/69) | 72% (42/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (26/52) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 29% (5/17) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (34/88) | 43% (52/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-1 | |||||
| 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) |
Stats 
Michael Lammer
Player
Ivo Minar
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
121)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
121)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 7-6(6) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ivo Minar | Michael Lammer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ivo Minar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Ivo Minar
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivo Minar
Player
David Simunek
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Ivo Minar
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Lazov
Player
Ivo Minar
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Ivo Minar
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Lammer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Michael Lammer
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Michael Lammer
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Wang
Player
Michael Lammer
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
76)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Fischer
Player
Michael Lammer
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Tom Jomby
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Maxime Teixeira
38%
(
24 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Bruno Volkmann
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Michael Lammer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Gicquel
Player
Michael Lammer
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Minar Vs Lammer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
