Ivo Minar vs Lenny Hampel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Minar vs Hampel analysis and find out who is favored!
Ivo Minar vs Lenny Hampel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Minar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hampel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Minar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hampel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Minar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hampel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Minar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hampel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Minar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Hampel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 172/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Minar winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Minar winning 2 and Hampel winning 1. The last match between Minar and Hampel was at the Poprad Tatry Challenger, 11-06-2016, Q1 round, Clay with Ivo Minar getting the victory 1100037767.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Minar and Hampel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Minar winning 1 times and Hampel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Minar winning 0, and Hampel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Minar has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hampel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Minar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hampel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Minar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hampel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Minar 1 - 0 Hampel
10
Total
0
Mast
9
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
62
High
39
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
359
High
27
Age
R
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
55% (379-315)
Career Total W/L
60% (255-171)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$371,465
Career Prize Money
$6,945
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ivo Minar | Lenny Hampel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:42 | 1:42:42 |
1st Serve % | 56% (48/86) | 47% (41/87) |
1st Serve Win% | 56% (27/48) | 71% (29/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 68% (26/38) | 59% (27/46) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 67% (4/6) |
Return Points W% | 36% (31/87) | 38% (33/86) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-4 7-5 |
Ivo Minar
Player
Lenny Hampel
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
89
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ivo Minar | Lenny Hampel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ivo Minar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Roman Safiullin
Player
Ivo Minar
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ivo Minar
Player
David Simunek
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dennis Novak
Player
Ivo Minar
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Lazov
Player
Ivo Minar
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Ivo Minar
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Lenny Hampel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Henri Squire
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Andre Biro
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matteo Martineau
Player
Lenny Hampel
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Timo Stodder
Player
Lenny Hampel
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Matic Dimic
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
52
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 0-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Neil Oberleitner
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more