Ivan Gakhov vs Emilio Rodriguez-Navarro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gakhov vs Rodriguez-Navarro analysis and find out who is favored!
Ivan Gakhov vs Emilio Rodriguez-Navarro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gakhov has won 46.01% of points on his second serve, while Rodriguez-Navarro has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gakhov, in recent form, has won 49.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rodriguez-Navarro has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.82% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gakhov has saved 65.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rodriguez-Navarro has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gakhov has won 40.38% of matches played (W/L 21/ 31), with Rodriguez-Navarro winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gakhov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 402/ 230), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Rodriguez-Navarro has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 25/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Gakhov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 18/ 22), where as Rodriguez-Navarro has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gakhov has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.71 while Rodriguez-Navarro has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gakhov has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rodriguez-Navarro has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gakhov has converted 43.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rodriguez-Navarro has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gakhov 0 - 0 Rodriguez-Navarro
16
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
14
Minor
272
Rank
142
High
27
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (464-295)
Career Total W/L
36% (35-63)
38% (8-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$56,825
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gakhov VS Rodriguez-Navarro H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ivan Gakhov | Emilio Rodriguez-Navarro |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (21/26) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (231/239) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.43 | 0 |
Aces Total | 100 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
DFs Total | 76 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:38 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 252.43 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (931/1578) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (652/931) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (300/647) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (54/123) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (566/1501) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Henri Squire
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alexander Weis
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Ivan Gakhov
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more