Iva Jovic vs Rebeka Masarova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W W L
Form
L W W W L W L W W LHead To Head: Jovic 1 - 0 Masarova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jovic winning 2 and Masarova winning 1. The last match between Jovic and Masarova was at the Lexus Ilkley Open - Ilkley, 10-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Grass, with Iva Jovic getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Iva Jovic | 1 |
| Rebeka Masarova | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Lexus Ilkley Open - Ilkley(10-06-2025)
Iva Jovic
Rebeka Masarova
3
6
6
3
6
4
| Jovic | Stats | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (25-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (30-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 87 | Ranking | 97 |
| 87 | Highest Rank | 62 |
| 17 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 6 |
| 75% (65-22) | Career Total W/L | 63% (261-153) |
| $562,420 | Career Prize Money | $945,494 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Begu VS Siskova PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Iva Jovic
Player
Rebeka Masarova
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
0
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:11:26 | Average Match Time | 2:11:26 |
| 65% (66/102) | 1st Serve % | 66% (55/83) |
| 70% (46/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (43/55) |
| 53% (19/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 8% (1/12) |
| 31% (26/83) | Return Points Win % | 36% (37/102) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jovic vs Masarova Match Preview :
- Masarova's second serve success rate is slightly higher than Jovic's, with 40.88% compared to 37.73%. How does this affect their chances? Winning a higher percentage of second serve points gives Masarova a slight edge in this aspect.
- In returning their opponent's second serves, Jovic excels, winning 53.49% of points, compared to Masarova's 48.97%. This can be crucial in breaking serve.
- Jovic also leads in returning first serves with 32.91%, outperforming Masarova's 29.99%, potentially putting more pressure on Masarova's serve.
- Under pressure, Masarova saves 50.74% of breakpoints, which is superior to Jovic's 44.39%, indicating resilience in critical moments.
- Overall match performance shows Jovic has a higher win percentage in the past year (73.33%) compared to Masarova (55.93%), suggesting better overall form.
- Both players excel on clay but Jovic has a slightly superior win percentage (74%) compared to Masarova (67%), giving Jovic an edge on this surface.
- In terms of player level, Jovic's 80% win rate at the $10K+ level surpasses Masarova’s 61.9%, highlighting greater success in similar competitive fields.
- The average rank of opponents played favors Masarova, who has faced tougher competition (rank 139.24 versus 261.44 for Jovic), giving her more high-level match experience.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Jovic's 77% win rate in such scenarios is highly promising against Masarova's 59%.
- Regarding break point conversion, Jovic converts 46.72% of opportunities, well above Masarova's 32.79%, suggesting a key advantage in critical moments during matches.
Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):
Assessing recent performance, Jovic demonstrates slight advantages in several technical aspects, including return game efficiency and break point conversion.
Masarova, however, has proven more resilient under pressure and has faced higher-quality opponents, which may enhance her competitive edge.
Both players are adept on clay, but Jovic's superior track record and decisive set performance could be pivotal factors.
Given these factors, the prediction favors Jovic as the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match, poised to leverage her strengths to secure victory.
Jovic vs Masarova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Iva Jovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Iva Jovic
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Katarzyna Kawa
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Julia Riera
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Linda Klimovicova
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
49 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Rebecca Marino
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
84%
(
46 of
55)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Viktorija Golubic
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
94)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Talia Gibson
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
99
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Rebeka Masarova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Rebeka Masarova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
53
|
2-6 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Laura Pigossi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Rebeka Masarova
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Alina Korneeva
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Rebeka Masarova
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Sofia Kenin
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Ella Seidel
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75% (65/22) | Win/Loss | 63% (261/153) |
| 69% (136/61) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (584/380) |
| 58% (1039/760) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4841/4082) |
| 74% (40/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (82/48) |
| 74% (17/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (145/73) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (22/20) |
| 89% (8/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (12/12) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 85 | Aces Total | 1422 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 148 | Total Double Faults | 1450 |
| 1:39:57 | Average Match Time | 1:30:25 |
| 330.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.97 |
| 61% (3282/5393) | 1st Serve % | 62% (16722/26854) |
| 63% (2056/3282) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11065/16722) |
| 51% (1068/2111) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4666/10132) |
| 52% (386/744) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1438/3089) |
| 49% (2701/5528) | Return Points Win % | 44% (11742/26434) |
| 60% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 50% (16/16) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 51% (20/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (40/31) |
| 79% (53/14) | Challenger W/L | 64% (119/66) |
| 80% (4/1) | Futures W/L | 76% (65/20) |
| 75% (64/85) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (253/401) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 38% (6/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (67/107) |
| 72% (18/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (77/147) |
| 93% (61/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (259/214) |
| 7% (61/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (259/43) |
| 31% (26/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (155/46) |
Jovic vs. Masarova Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
