Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Issam Haitham Taweel vs Jakub Paul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Taweel vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Issam Haitham Taweel vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Taweel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Paul has won 51.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Taweel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 58.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Taweel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Taweel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paul winning 62.12% (W/L 41/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Taweel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 83/ 104), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 101/ 166). Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Taweel winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Taweel winning 0 and Paul winning 2. The last match between Taweel and Paul was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 12-04-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jakub Paul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Taweel and Paul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Taweel winning 0 times and Paul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Taweel winning 0, and Paul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Taweel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 221.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Taweel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Taweel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 50.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Taweel 0 - 1 Paul
Ret.
Rank
635
High
34
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
522
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
41% (184-270)
Career Total W/L
54% (173-145)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,285
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Issam Haitham Taweel | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:0 | 1:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (40/69) | 62% (43/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (25/40) | 60% (26/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (11/29) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (32/69) | 48% (33/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Jakub Paul
Player
Issam Haitham Taweel
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Issam Haitham Taweel | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (28/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (244/228) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 240.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1024/1533) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (633/1024) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (255/509) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (79/156) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (656/1526) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Issam Haitham Taweel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Issam Haitham Taweel
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Mattia Bellucci
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Niklas Johansson
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Taweel Vs Paul Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
