Isis Louise Van Den Broek vs Julia Stusek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W W L
Form
W L W W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Broek 1 - 0 Stusek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Broek winning 2 and Stusek winning 0. The last match between Broek and Stusek was at the W15 Monastir, 22-03-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Hard, with Isis Louise Van Den Broek getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Isis Louise Van Den Broek | 1 |
| Julia Stusek | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Monastir(22-03-2025)
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Julia Stusek
6
1
6
1
| Broek | Stats | Stusek |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (27-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (9-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 569 | Ranking | 857 |
| 569 | Highest Rank | 749 |
| 19 | Age | 17 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 65% (58-31) | Career Total W/L | 56% (23-18) |
| $2,585 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Navone PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Schoolkate VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Julia Stusek
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:15:39 | Average Match Time | 1:15:39 |
| 67% (32/48) | 1st Serve % | 50% (23/46) |
| 59% (19/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (5/23) |
| 78% (7/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 67% (31/46) | Return Points Win % | 42% (20/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Isis Louise Van Den Broek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
81%
(
46 of
57)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Valeriya Strakhova
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Adrienn Nagy
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
100%
(
7 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
0
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Joy De Zeeuw
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
2
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Emily Seibold
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
46%
(
32 of
70)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Sarah Van Emst
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
102)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Malkia Menguene
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Stusek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 1-6 7-6(10) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Julia Stusek
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maelle Leclercq
Player
Julia Stusek
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (58/31) | Win/Loss | 56% (23/18) |
| 62% (128/79) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (51/41) |
| 55% (1040/850) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (425/377) |
| 66% (19/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) |
| 66% (37/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (12/8) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 43 | Aces Total | 39 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 311 | Total Double Faults | 168 |
| 1:37:58 | Average Match Time | 1:30:20 |
| 439.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 434.49 |
| 69% (3827/5572) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1605/2544) |
| 58% (2221/3827) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (959/1605) |
| 46% (795/1745) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (428/939) |
| 54% (403/741) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (163/327) |
| 49% (2715/5509) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1126/2457) |
| 50% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (9/9) | Challenger W/L | 52% (12/11) |
| 70% (47/20) | Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) |
| 65% (58/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (23/41) |
| 62% (8/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 59% (17/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 90% (60/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (25/22) |
| 10% (60/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (25/3) |
| 14% (29/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (16/1) |
Broek vs. Stusek Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
