I. L. V. D. Broek
To Win
C. Grignac
To Win
Isis Louise Van Den Broek vs Elena Korokozidi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W W L
Form
L W W W L L L W W LH2H: Broek 1 - 0 Korokozidi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Broek winning 2 and Korokozidi winning 0. The last match between Broek and Korokozidi was at the W15 Manacor, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Isis Louise Van Den Broek getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Isis Louise Van Den Broek | 1 |
| Elena Korokozidi | 0 |
W15 Manacor(19-02-2025)
73% (8-3)
YTD Win/Loss
57% (8-6)
1
Head-to-Head
0
871
Ranking
822
690
Highest Rank
766
19
Age
21
-
Plays
-
1
Titles
0
62% (39-24)
Career Total W/L
53% (62-54)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Mar 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Fonseca PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Broek VS Korokozidi H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Elena Korokozidi
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Broek VS Korokozidi H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
5
1
Aces (Total)
1
0
Total Double Faults
4
1:29:28
Average Match Time
1:29:28
75% (40/53)
1st Serve %
51% (30/59)
68% (27/40)
1st Serve Win %
53% (16/30)
69% (9/13)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (12/29)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
33% (1/3)
53% (31/59)
Return Points Win %
32% (17/53)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Isis Louise Van Den Broek vs Elena Korokozidi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Isis Louise Van Den Broek 1 - 0 Elena Korokozidi
The performance of the second serve in recent form can provide valuable insights for predicting the outcome of a tennis match. Over the past six months, it has been observed that Broek has achieved a success rate of 43.19% on their second serve, while Korokozidi has achieved a slightly higher rate of 43.71%. This statistic demonstrates a significant correlation between second serve performance and match prediction accuracy.
Another crucial factor to consider is the return game stats, which shed light on a player's ability to handle their opponent's serves. Recent form shows that Broek has displayed exceptional prowess, winning 56.02% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Korokozidi has also delivered an impressive performance, winning 58.64% of these points. The first serve return stats are equally important, with Broek achieving a success rate of 44.98% and Korokozidi trailing slightly behind at 39.66%. These numbers hold substantial predictive value in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Analyzing players' performances under pressure is another essential aspect of match prediction. Broek has proven their proficiency in saving breakpoints, successfully defending against 52.73% of them in recent form. Meanwhile, Korokozidi has also demonstrated resilience, saving 45.31% of breakpoints. This statistical insight proves to be extremely valuable for in-game betting predictions.
Taking an overview of their performances over the past year provides a broader perspective. Broek has maintained a notable win rate of 57.14%, with a record of 16 wins and 12 losses. Meanwhile, Korokozidi has achieved a slightly higher win rate of 58.7%, with 27 wins and 19 losses. These figures contribute to an overall head-to-head prediction overview.
Considering the impact of playing surface on performance, it's worth noting that Broek excels on hard courts, boasting a career win rate of 65% (11 wins and 6 losses). In contrast, their performance on grass courts hasn't been as impressive, with an unfortunate 0% win rate (0 wins and 1 loss). Similarly, Korokozidi thrives on hard courts, maintaining a career win rate of 63% (5 wins and 3 losses). However, their performance on indoor hard courts is comparatively weaker, with a win rate of 45% (5 wins and 6 losses).
Player level and the level of tournaments they compete in also play a significant role in predicting favorites. Broek has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, where they have excelled with a win rate of 66.67% (14 wins and 7 losses). Conversely, Korokozidi has competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, achieving a win rate of 56.25% (18 wins and 14 losses). It is crucial to consider these discrepancies in event levels when comparing player statistics to predict favorites.
Analyzing opponent quality stats is yet another factor to consider. Over the past 12 months, Broek has faced opponents with an average rank of 373.21. In comparison, Korokozidi has encountered players with an average rank of 315.46. These statistics highlight the level of competition each player has faced and provide further insights for match prediction.
Deciding set performances are pivotal, especially for live predictions and in-play betting. Broek has displayed a commendable ability to excel in deciding sets, winning 50% of such sets over the past year. In contrast, Korokozidi has showcased even greater proficiency, triumphing in 69% of all matches played on tour. These findings hold considerable significance for those interested in live predictions and betting scenarios.
While past player performance is a valuable tool in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event stats for indications of an in-form player. Once an event is underway, analyzing the performance of players in real-time becomes crucial. This analysis can be found in the section below titled "eventStats" (if the players have already participated in matches during the current event). Additionally, certain players exhibit better performances at specific events, and this should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
Break point conversion rates present a telling statistic for in-game live betting tips. Broek has displayed a remarkable ability to convert breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on 54.17% of chances. Similarly, Korokozidi has proven their efficiency, converting 48.85% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve. These numbers provide valuable insights for making informed betting decisions during pivotal moments in the match.
For those intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, an article available at the following link serves as an excellent starting point: article. Please note that this resource caters to stats enthusiasts exclusively.
(Sources: Various statistical data from official tennis sources)
Isis Louise Van Den Broek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Julia Stusek
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Victoria Pohle
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Maelle Leclercq
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
51%
(
37 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Arabella Koller
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Elena Korokozidi
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Elena Korokozidi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gloria Ceschi
Player
Elena Korokozidi
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
41%
(
40 of
98)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
13
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Korokozidi
Player
Martina Colmegna
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
88%
(
44 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Korokozidi
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
45%
(
28 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Elena Korokozidi
53%
(
61 of
115)
1st Serve %
47%
(
47 of
101)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
12
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
35%
(
19 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
58 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 2-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Elena Korokozidi
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Loes Ebeling Koning
Player
Elena Korokozidi
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
62% (39/24)
Win/Loss
53% (62/54)
59% (87/60)
Sets Win/Loss
52% (142/131)
54% (735/626)
Games Win/Loss
51% (1321/1279)
64% (16/9)
Hard Win/Loss
50% (5/5)
62% (23/14)
Clay Win/Loss
55% (52/42)
0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L
42% (5/7)
0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.05
Aces Per Game
0.05
30
Aces Total
60
0.37
Double Faults Per Game
0.4
247
Total Double Faults
503
1:40:21
Average Match Time
1:20:56
426.16
Average Opponent Rank
423.78
68% (2741/4042)
1st Serve %
56% (3538/6303)
58% (1587/2741)
1st Serve Win %
57% (2009/3538)
44% (577/1301)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (1143/2765)
55% (295/540)
Break Points Won % (Total)
51% (459/899)
49% (1962/3971)
Return Points Win %
49% (3163/6415)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
47% (7/8)
Challenger W/L
48% (25/27)
68% (32/15)
Futures W/L
58% (37/27)
62% (39/63)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
53% (60/114)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
60% (6/10)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (8/16)
57% (12/21)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (23/43)
90% (40/36)
1st Set Won, Won Match
82% (60/49)
10% (40/4)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
18% (60/11)
13% (23/3)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
23% (56/13)
See recent tennis photos of Broek and Korokozidi
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Isis Louise Van Den Broek
View full predicted draw for Broek
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Elena Korokozidi
View full predicted draw for Korokozidi
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
